Coast to Coast AM 8/29/11 - Richard C. Hoagland on Comet Elenin Part 5 of 6

C2C science advisor Richard C. Hoagland shared updates on Comet Elenin and the International Space Station (ISS). "I smell a big political rat," he said, in reaction to a recent report that the ISS could be abandoned. "I think NASA wants to have an empty space station up there," controlled robotically for a certain period of time, he conjectured, adding that without astronauts there to conduct maintenance, the station could fall apart.

When Comet Elenin reaches its closest point to Earth (22 million miles), it will pose no danger to us, yet because of various "hyperdimensional" measurements and parameters, Hoagland has concluded that it has a specifically designed trajectory. It's an artificial object sent by an intelligence, possibly as a kind of time capsule by our ancestors, he argued. It also appears to have a tetrahedral shape (see article below), which suggests it's an actual ship with generators, computers, and controls, he continued.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• coast
• to
• am
• george
• noory
• richard
• c.
• hoagland
• ufo
• space
• alien
• aliens
• comet
• elenin
• moon
• earth
• part
• 2011

[preparadox]

immortality would make children obsolete...not a great thing IMHO.

[divyolina]

excellent!

[1THETRUTH10]

@TheGambler666 David Wilcock,Terence Mckenna......lots of fun at the fair. You want to belive these people to make ur life more interesting.....exciting...and if these people had to produce evidence for their theories....well things would get boring very fast.

[TheGambler666]

@1THETRUTH10 oh man, the only embarrassment here is you. Peer review (academia) is the most rigorously controlled institution there is, only the prevailing orthodoxy is included but it's kind of a gauche insistence anyway given the non-compartmentalised / interdisciplanry nature of his theories. John Lash, Terence McKenna, David Wilcock, Graham Hancock and so on on forever aren't peer reviewed but their work's priceless. Peer review (other than math e.g. Dr Eliyahu Rips's Bible Code) is a joke.

[Apalachee207]

There are Dark forces at work on this planet...The final showdown is on the horizon between Light and dark, good and evil...I'll take Jesus' word that everything we see and witness is part of events that will be so terrible, men will have heart failure from the fear..He says not to be deceived by miracles and scorcery. When He arrives HIMSELF, every eye shall see Him...Before that though, will be great SIGNS AND WONDERS in the heavens and earth and under the earth...Call on Him! He Saves!

[1THETRUTH10]

@TheGambler666 Oh jesus christ!!! Those old yt debate cliches that now get spouted by people who dont even understand them. "Appeal to authority","Argumentum ad Hominem"....it's embarrassing. Hogland also has his own maths system for the face (hill) on mars..oh and the pyrimids....the guy is the einstein of his day. Having work peer reviewed is a test all theories must go through....have it tested...if ur right it promotes your ideas..surely that would be good for Hogland?

[TheGambler666]

@1THETRUTH10 I repeat "refute his claims substantively or don't waste ppl's time" Resorting to the Appeal To Authority fallacy and Argumentum ad Hominem does nothing substantive for your empty ignorant assertions.

Incidentally, did you even listen to the number codings he cited in support of his view that Elenin is under intelligent control? The chance of this being mere coincidence is approaching zero. Unless you have something other than farmyard noises, don't bother me again.

[1THETRUTH10]

@TheGambler666 On all the points I made u say Hogland is right..hmmmm. Do u think comet Elenin is under intelligent control? I used to want to belive him and Im not mocking the guy but he's not taken seriously as a scientist. None of his ideas have been peer reviewed...and never will be. He thinks the film star wars is coded with all kinds of secret info. He's good for coast to coast though as he's never boring and is fun to listen to.

[TheGambler666]

@1THETRUTH10 he's right on every count .. our own moon is a hollowed out craft too a quarter the size of earth so that accounting for its existence leads some to joke "observational error" yet a mere 1/81st of its mass (read Who Built the Moon? by Knight n Butler)

Hoagland always backs his claims with evidence so you can't point to them and say he must be wrong b/c it sounds so outlandish, that's just a boring worthless waste of time .. refute his claims substantively or don't waste ppl's time

[JayFive82]

@1THETRUTH10 Thats your job to find evidence. Just because you don't find it does not mean it does not exist. To take anybody on there word is foolish, but just being aware of the information is the important part. You are determining his information is most likely false, as do alot of people to many 'unlikely' stories because it does not fit inside there comfort zone of possibility. The truth is anything is possible until we have the proof. The problem is even evidence is not to be trusted!!!