Some Copy/Paste of Eddie Johns "More Spell On You"

This is a video responce to "Origins 10 - The Music Of Daft Punk" video I put up a while back. It's not perfect, but here's how things may have been cut up to create "One More Time". Enjoy!
http://www.djtutor.com/briansredd/origins_series

Category:

Music

Tags:

• DJ
• Tutor
• brian
• redd
• briansredd
• daft
• punk
• eddie
• johns
• one
• more
• time
• mobile
• sample
• origins
• 10
• oreginsb

[shinjikun03]

ruined the song!?!?!? wtf!.. I think no one could sample "more spell on you" that way... they took a fine song and transformed it into one of the best songs in the world... dude that's something..

[briansredd]

Who said that they ruined it?

[calicuz]

Thanks for this video. I had difficulty hearing the sample from the Eddie Johns' song and now.... "it's all so clear"..... LOL!!!!!!!!!!

I'm very disapointed in Thomas Bangalter claiming there were no samples used in "One More Time"..... "Give credit where credit is due" I say. Eddie Johns' "More Spell On You" is a great song, and I didn't even know the song existed until I began researching "One More Time", and "One More Time" is a great song as well. Thanks again.....

[calicuz]

@ttoxique - I read it in a Wikipedia article, but not sure just how sure you consider Wikipedia to be a reliable source. You Tube wont let me share a link to the article so you'll have to look it up for yourself under "One More Time (Daft Punk song).

You'll find it in the 5th paragraph of the article. I don't own a copy of "Discovery" so I don't know if Daft Punk gave credit to "Eddie Johns" or not.

[ttoxique]

@calicuz from what reliable source did you hear Bangalter deny the sampling?

They admit that they sampled a lot on discovery.

"At the same time, when you use samples, you don't have this problem. When you use a sampler, nobody plays on it, so the problem of the ego of the musician is not really there. For everything that we do, no matter how you get to the results, the important thing is the result."

[KeysOnFire17]

2:23 <--- Exactly time to see the example and do not waste your time listening to this guy xD

[KeysOnFire17]

Yo soy de Colombia, :trollface: PROBLEM?

[ozo96]

Creo que soy el unico mexicano que a comentado aqui

Pero creo que es genial !

Por fin entendi lo del sampler !

:D

[speewave]

heres the ultimate test... take the sound you made, invert the wave forms... see if you can line them up with "One More Time" and if you can match them up, the beat should cancel out and you'll hear mainly vocals if the song...

[yaldao1]

@intron9 No, it's not that simple, i've listened to MANY artists. They are great musicians because of what they have done WITH the samples that they have taken. You can't start hating on others because you didn't find the samples before them or something like that (Not talking about you personally). What i'm trying to say is, just look at where they have taken the samples, what part of the song(s), and what they've made it to, they even create their own bassline with the samples.

[intron9]

Are you kidding, aren't you? A genius isn't a guy who picks a song then cuts it and transposes it to avoid copyright issues (see what happened to Black Box's "Ride on Time").Come on! They just made a sample based rythm because it fits in electro style. Maybe you say they made very well electronic music, dance grooves, (I think they do), but if you say they are GREAT musicians, you simply didn't listen to many. Goes for everybody.

[soadevpiPod]

Masterfully executed! I love Daft Punk!