As a side project while working on the next big lego opera... which will be pretty grand... I wanted to try something a little different. Christian Zeal and Activity is one of the lesser known, but...
As a side project while working on the next big lego opera... which will be pretty grand... I wanted to try something a little different. Christian Zeal and Activity is one of the lesser known, but incredibly powerful, pieces by the American composer John Adams. Growing up in rural churches across Indiana, this piece just makes sense to me. It captures the value and beauty in a religion that's often plagued with bad stereotypes. There are sections in this piece that have been cut.. the original is a little over 10 minutes longs, but the spoken parts in this video have remained uncut and are presented as Adams intended... with the exception of all the lego people.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
It wasn't actually originally part of it, however it was kind of made that way by an early intepretation as below. I found this on a blog which mentioned this piece.
"The unique aleatoric element of Zeal is what really makes the piece special. The conductor is directed to place "sonic found objects" into the composition. Edo De Waart, conductor of the San Francisco Symphony Orchestra spliced and looped a recording of a 1971 sermon into the piece."
Not just "part" of it. It's the originating material of the work.
Adams and several other Minimalists were well-versed in the techniques of looping, reassembling, and otherwise mutilating audio tapes to magical effect.
If you'd like to hear the possible inspiration for this work, (as well as have your mind blown), check out "It's Gonna Rain" by Steve Reich. In that one, a street preacher's ranting gets molecularly rearranged, reassembled, and spat out whole again in about 10 minutes. :-)
It is kind of funny how many people take this piece as though it were straight sentimentalism or religiosity.
Adams's fascination with how words become blather, and how chorale harmonies can make vanilla of anything, apparently glide past, unnoticed, by some in this audience.
(He's not playing a joke AGAINST you, you know. You're actually expected to notice that something's a little fishy with the sentimentality -- it's the purpose of the whole piece.)
It was a little disturbing at first- the obvious use of banter in the religious context (because it's never quite as obvious in the actual services), but over the years of listening to it, I've realize that this banter is an element of my identity and the identity of so many others. The soft musical background does frame the piece in a certain context- there's no cleverness there- so what I really enjoy is the true authenticity of the speaker. It can be a religious experience.
My goodness, you've managed to completely miss the ambivalence of this entire work, as though you thought it were just a little bit of sincere Mr Copland!
Didn't you notice the fragmentation of speech? The way the words cease to have meaning? This is a much more complex musical statement than you are giving it credit for!
Try reading up on John Adams' work -- you may get some (albeit rude) but wonderful surprises. He is a master.
I sort of understood your point, ikshields. There's one part where the words are cut off and pasted into, "forgive sin but God." Which just sounds really curious.
But then again, I understand barkingbartok. I mean, in the end music can be an experience, and I think if he experienced a spiritual experience, it's fine. I almost always miss what the composer's intent when writing a piece, but sometimes that's what makes the piece much more enjoyable than if I understood it.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Adams and several other Minimalists were well-versed in the techniques of looping, reassembling, and otherwise mutilating audio tapes to magical effect.
If you'd like to hear the possible inspiration for this work, (as well as have your mind blown), check out "It's Gonna Rain" by Steve Reich. In that one, a street preacher's ranting gets molecularly rearranged, reassembled, and spat out whole again in about 10 minutes. :-)
Adams's fascination with how words become blather, and how chorale harmonies can make vanilla of anything, apparently glide past, unnoticed, by some in this audience.
(He's not playing a joke AGAINST you, you know. You're actually expected to notice that something's a little fishy with the sentimentality -- it's the purpose of the whole piece.)
This is a little disturbing!
Didn't you notice the fragmentation of speech? The way the words cease to have meaning? This is a much more complex musical statement than you are giving it credit for!
Try reading up on John Adams' work -- you may get some (albeit rude) but wonderful surprises. He is a master.
But then again, I understand barkingbartok. I mean, in the end music can be an experience, and I think if he experienced a spiritual experience, it's fine. I almost always miss what the composer's intent when writing a piece, but sometimes that's what makes the piece much more enjoyable than if I understood it.