Bill Whittle chalks out the basics of Tea Party Conservatism. In this segment, Bill talks about the advantages of small government and free enterprise.
@TheAlfonz69 Ever think the numbers are the way they are because of the American people's lifestyle? Why blame poor diet and lack of exercise on low life expectancy when it's easier to scream racism and blame the people who aren't afraid to tell the truth.
The sad thing is, you are the one ignoring the facts. But you've been dazzled by Hollywood celebs and a few words on a teleprompter. Ot would be nice if the left realized their own ignorance
At least the positive point is, if the US continue to vote for the stalemate or the conservatives,
the US loses all of it's influence in the world.
Maybe you even come up with an answer to the question if mankind has been created by an superior being or evovled through the billions of years. There's noone else in this world that is seriously asking this question.
The declarative assertion that state run healthcare has always failed fails to account for the fact that the top 30 countries for citizen's healthcare satisfaction, and in WHO rankings are European states with state-run systems. The US does not even feature in this top 30. It also has a markedly lower life expectancy, and higher infant mortality rate than any of these countries. Facts, ignored in favour of age old, simplistic, grade school economics in this viedo.
@PCGamer1224 No, drug laws shouldn't be handle strictly by the federal government (the big government thing I was mentioning) and it should be left to the states, just as you say. Drug legalization is not at all comparable to legalizing murder. You'd do well to know that in the last century, every drug that we have in this country was completely legal and yet that didn't seem to destroy our society in the least bit.
so by that extent then we should just allow all drugs, and allow people to murder anyone. The government has to maintain these things, doesn't matter if its a big government or a small one. Which is why we have states rights, if California wants to legalize weed, then that's all up to them.
@Premier112 Good question. My answer would be that if corporations are able to fund big government regulators then the consequence could only be a less free market and instead have a corporatist system. That to me is not a free market. I believe that it should be illeagal for corporations to fund fund politcians and also outlaw a politicians ability to recieve money directly from corporations-even if it's the Koch brothers. I alsi believe in loosenig laws that restrict competition.
If corporations benefited best from free markets, why in the Hell, do they send BILLIONS to big government "regulators?" What the hell. If corporations benefited best in free markets, why aren't they sending Billions, to free market libertarians? They don't! They send it to Obama-style leftists & Bush fake-conservative leftists whose "conservatism" never consist beyond tax-cuts.
Corporations Hate a free market. But don't tell statists that the free market is like the frickin' boogeyman to them.
@Factorialofn What does this have to do with the video?
And there are people shouting bullshit all the time. Doesn't mean they're right. Sometimes they're just spouting bullshit.
maychorian 4 days ago
@TheAlfonz69 Ever think the numbers are the way they are because of the American people's lifestyle? Why blame poor diet and lack of exercise on low life expectancy when it's easier to scream racism and blame the people who aren't afraid to tell the truth.
The sad thing is, you are the one ignoring the facts. But you've been dazzled by Hollywood celebs and a few words on a teleprompter. Ot would be nice if the left realized their own ignorance
BigDaddySam85 4 days ago
why does nobody stand up and yell "Bullshit!"?
At least the positive point is, if the US continue to vote for the stalemate or the conservatives,
the US loses all of it's influence in the world.
Maybe you even come up with an answer to the question if mankind has been created by an superior being or evovled through the billions of years. There's noone else in this world that is seriously asking this question.
Factorialofn 5 days ago
@matrim41
ya well also in the last century drugs were much harder to get a hold of.
PCGamer1224 1 week ago
The declarative assertion that state run healthcare has always failed fails to account for the fact that the top 30 countries for citizen's healthcare satisfaction, and in WHO rankings are European states with state-run systems. The US does not even feature in this top 30. It also has a markedly lower life expectancy, and higher infant mortality rate than any of these countries. Facts, ignored in favour of age old, simplistic, grade school economics in this viedo.
TheAlfonz69 1 week ago
@PCGamer1224 No, drug laws shouldn't be handle strictly by the federal government (the big government thing I was mentioning) and it should be left to the states, just as you say. Drug legalization is not at all comparable to legalizing murder. You'd do well to know that in the last century, every drug that we have in this country was completely legal and yet that didn't seem to destroy our society in the least bit.
matrim41 1 week ago
@matrim41
so by that extent then we should just allow all drugs, and allow people to murder anyone. The government has to maintain these things, doesn't matter if its a big government or a small one. Which is why we have states rights, if California wants to legalize weed, then that's all up to them.
PCGamer1224 1 week ago
@Premier112 Good question. My answer would be that if corporations are able to fund big government regulators then the consequence could only be a less free market and instead have a corporatist system. That to me is not a free market. I believe that it should be illeagal for corporations to fund fund politcians and also outlaw a politicians ability to recieve money directly from corporations-even if it's the Koch brothers. I alsi believe in loosenig laws that restrict competition.
eskimospy77 1 week ago
@PCGamer1224 Drug laws are a big government thing.
matrim41 1 week ago
If corporations benefited best from free markets, why in the Hell, do they send BILLIONS to big government "regulators?" What the hell. If corporations benefited best in free markets, why aren't they sending Billions, to free market libertarians? They don't! They send it to Obama-style leftists & Bush fake-conservative leftists whose "conservatism" never consist beyond tax-cuts.
Corporations Hate a free market. But don't tell statists that the free market is like the frickin' boogeyman to them.
Premier112 1 week ago