The human cost of animal testing part 5
Top Comments
All Comments (23)
-
@yaymejkok4 People use animal testing for more than just cancer.
-
@FatherTime89 I don't know the name of it, but Elisebeth Arden does her cosmetic testing by computer models. They can make a "computer cancer" then test it on artificial cells/artificial body.
-
Why do I conclude that these testers would also take pride in harming people as well...they seem sadistic enough..
Why test cosmetics on animals just so your 15 year old whore can prance around on street, get knocked up, and shit out more people.
-
Which computer model could they use?
-
@FatherTime89 Well, they can do computer modeling that's 98.9% accurate to humans, rather than 85.5% accurate. The EPA always checks for testing, so there isn't a way around it.
-
@yaymejkok4 Well it would make a great prank. Although they can always do cheaper tests that don't give results or just lie about doing any testing.
-
@FatherTime89 WEll, would you buy a prodct if it said: no testing done whatsoever. CAUTION: Could be radioactive?
-
@yaymejkok4 Then why not just do no testing or fake tests, it would save them even more money.
-
@FatherTime89 People get the idea that if drugs are tested on simply SOMETHING, it is safe. People are drowned into lies, which earns the drug companies more money than lost. Makes sense once you use your brain more, doesn't it?
-
@yaymejkok4 Where is the money coming from? The drug companies who would get no benefit if animal testing was useless?
thank you for posting this above many other videos this is a sane and easy to understand video
that does not try to play on my emotions or show pictures of things that i dont really understand
it has many facts that i will think about for a long time
iwannanothetruth 3 years ago 7
THank you for posting ! It will be forwarded to everyone
worldchaser 3 years ago 6