Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Today's Letter - Perry v. Schwarzenegger live video feed

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
273 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 10, 2010

Dear Governor Schwarzenegger,

In July of 2007 I wrote to you to ask you to sign AB 43, the bill that was heading to your desk that would have ended the segregation of same-sex and opposite-sex marriages in our state. When you vetoed it, you gave a bunch of excuses, especially saying that you had to veto it, or you would be sued.

Well, now you're being sued. Perry v. Schwarzenegger is hearing arguments tomorrow - broadcast to all the world - about whether you can enforce a law that breaks generations of a most sacred traditional value: that every citizen is entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

You refused to step in to stop the Opponents of Equality from redefining equality in our state. You failed to protect me and my children from the tyranny of the majority. And you were a poor steward of the Constitution that generations of Californians used to define fairness and equality, from those that would take it away.

So we went over your head. Now the Federal courts will decide if you can reach into the population and carve out a group of people, and assign them different rights because of the way they were born or what they believe.

It is sad that it has come to this: it is much more important to have the majority of Californians support marriage equality than to have a law about it. You could have helped, but now you're being sued. Hurray for justice.

Sincerely,

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (signab43)

  • When the California Governor vetoed the marriage equality bill, he said at the time that either the people OR the courts should make the decision. He publicly APPLAUDED the court for its decision to allow same sex marriage, saying he stood by it. And he very publicly came out AGAINST Prop 8, and has refused, along with the Att. General, to defend the state in this lawsuit. SO let's get the story straight.

  • I don't dispute the facts. However Governor Schwarzenegger could have signed AB 43, and he certainly could have (and still can) furiously denounce the parts of the Republican Party that still somehow thinks that it is appropriate to have the extermination of same-sex families featured in its official party platform.

see all

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Someone back there missed a critical principle of American national formation, that while they *might* (might!) be able to claim that the Constitution of the United States does not guarantee "the pursuit of happiness," the FOUNDING and FORMATIONAL document of this nation, our Declaration of Independence, DOES. The Founding Fathers stated so, quite literally and quite emphatically. Why, they even had the chutzpah to say that such right is INALIENABLE to all, and that this is SELF-EVIDENT TRUTH!

  • There's a KKK member two cubes over. There's a Jew two cubes the other way. Both has a job. Get over yourself.

    If you hate people that much, you shouldn't be in a workplace, you should be a Catholic Priest and out of the way of honest, respectful people.

    It's a shame we have to have laws to make that happen, but apparently we do.

  • the same way members of KKK, or those who oppose interracial marriages, lose their jobs.

  • well, if that were true, I can only say "better you than me."

    But of course, it's just another lie by the Opponents of Equality. How in the world would you "lose your job," unless you're one of the selfish wingnuts who is profiting from this whole battle?

  • not yet, but if perry wins, meaning we will have a law stating that homosexual marriage is a civil right, I will be punished by losing my job, or not being able to get jobs with good security and benefits. I will be put on the same board as racists by the society, and I don't want this to happen.

    That's why Perry case makes me worry.

  • How, pray tell, is my happy marriage punishing you?

  • Our Constitution, does not guarantee the pursuit of happiness, it guarantees everybody's freedom to life, liberty, and property. But people like you, want to silence people like me, thus take away my liberties.

    Nowhere in Constution it says that people should be punished for criticizing any kinds of behavior, including homosexual sex. Yet, you are trying to create laws that would punish me for speaking my mind. That does not make sense.

  • oh, you poor misfortunate soul, being harassed because of your beliefs. You didn't like that, did you? Then why would you do it to other people?

    Remember that bit about "life liberty and the pursuit of happiness." The Constitution does not intend to protect anyone's freedom, it intends to protect everyone's freedom.

    If you were spreading lies like this in college, and refused to even read the documents you were 'believing,' then you probably deserved to be attacked by your professors.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more