Comedian Dan Antopolski plays on ethical dilemma
Top Comments
All Comments (46)
-
@hewhosits Hang on ! Is it climate change or global warming your on about? Maybe all the Aluminium and Barium salts being sprayed into the atmosphere will give you the warming effect you desire in a few years, then we can all pay our Carbon Taxes to the Rothchilds , fuckin woop de doo. Your either a shill or a muppet , either way bog off!
-
@hewhosits yeah they decided to tackle the middle east also. Result = millions dead. Great guys these, wanted us all to get embalmed before we were dead courtesy of their swine flu vaccine. So trustworthy these rulers you speak so highly of! Ya fuckin troll supporting the Rothchilds and Al gore the rapist scumbag. Go back under the rock you slithered out from.
-
@gerryboy3699 Charming. I suppose you can provide links to peer-reviewed science suporting your claim.
-
@tory888 (cont) However, if we really want to kick our oil habit (for reasons of dependency, climate change or something else) then we need to fully embrace nuclear power. It is a travesty that in the UK the junior coalition partners (lib-dems) are the most green minded party of the big three and yet have an outdated, ill-informed opposition to nuclear power, which is the only reliable alternative to oil and coal feasible for the UK.
-
Climate change is undeniably happening, yes, and human development is certainly accelerating it. However, people proclaiming the world's doom are getting a few steps ahead of themselves. Truth is, this event has never occurred at this pace before, so we don't know the effects. There is a strong possibility that the Earth's natural cycle will sort itself out. (cont)
-
pure scum
-
*your
-
My favourite bit? The illiterate nature of the flat earthers commenting on this post. I see you haven't quite evolved from being apes, or else you spelling might just be a bit better.
If the science doesn't support your position, claim it is rigged. If the International community and every National and International scientific body of standing disagrees with you, claim it's a conspiracy. If your pet hypotheses fail to add up, claim it's censorship. If the physical data show rising temperatures, claim they're doctored. There's a word for this - paranoia. Either that or you're a troll out to stir things up.
hewhosits 2 years ago 8
It's not about proof, it's about evidence. The balance of evidence overwhelmingly supports anthropogenic climate change. You're right that the policy response is key. However, there is no Copenhagen Treaty yet, it is yet to be negotiated. There is no mention of a global government. That's just reds under the bed paranoia. The International community agreed action to tackle ozone depletion - no New World Order, no communist take over. The same sort of response is required now.
hewhosits 2 years ago 3