5/13/09: In an "Inconvenient Segment," Fox News' Glenn Beck interviews Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) about global warming. They claim that the proposed Environmental Protection Agency finding that global warming pollution threatens the public health and welfare is based on politics instead of science. Barrasso claims a "smoking gun" memo from the White House Office of Management and Budget that collected interagency opinions proves the EPA was playing politics. Beck also notes that he has a big head, wonders why he is eating California, and demonstrates that CO2 is what people exhale. "Look how much pollution I just put out."
His breath smells like Koch cock!
cmfluteguy 2 months ago
John Coleman!?! The guy who claims that GW is a deliberate manipulation of world temperature data of NASA!?! Ohhhhhhhh, those NASA people, always scheming and plotting with their SCIENCE, and MATH, and FACTS."Highly respected" From who? Fox "News" who has him on regularly.....And we all know that they are not pushing an agaenda! "It's propganda!" Uhhhhh. for what? What does that mean? What's the benefit of making it up!
AWESOME source!
conan1174 11 months ago
So species DO evolve......Except humans!?! That is the dumbest fucking thing I've ever heard. So, no biological changes ( AKA, EVOLUTION) have occured since we split with chimps 4-8 MYA!?!?!? That is beyond stupid.All you said was "Theory! Theory! Theory! Human evolution is a theory! That is a fact!" WHO SAYS IT!?! WHO!?! WHEN!?! Good bye- you stupid little maggot.
conan1174 11 months ago
Oh, and Glen Beck is not a climatologist, so can't use him. Have you EVER read a book on evolution? climate change? Biology? Paticipated in environmental projects, attended lectures? By books I mean, REAL books, not one written by some fox news douche nozzel, or a book that you made up. And by attending lectures, I mean outside of the esteemed community college that you dropped out of.
conan1174 11 months ago
NEAT! One guy! Sooooooooooooo.....900+articles isn't enough, but one guy that you just discovered on google is sufficient. HA!HA!HA! ONE FUCKING GUY.....Against the vast majority of scientists! You spew out "facts have been fudged, Just accept it" Listen you twerp - provide the info, OR SHUT THE FUCK UP. a list of names, resources, books, articles, RESEARCH THAT PROVIDES COMPELLING EVIDENCE. Don't fucking respond again unless you provide it.
conan1174 11 months ago
@conan1174 And get off of evolution. I never said the word, or the concept of evolution was a theory. Obviously species evolve.
Evolution regarding HUMANS is a theory. Just accept it. I am sorry, that is FACT. Now I realize there is a lot of compelling science that suggests we have evolved from apes. Our DNA is almost IDENTICAL to chimps. You would be dumb not to find that fascinating. But at the end of the day - THEORY.
dannyruxspin 11 months ago
@conan1174 John Coleman is a highly respected meteorologist.
It has been PROVEN that the data used to "prove" global warming has been fudged. And how many mansions does your savior Al Gore own? This solar-panel-prostitute doesn't even use them! THIS IS ALL FACT!
What is even more hilarious to me is your flaunting of hypocrisy. I doubt you drive an electric car, I am sure you do not have solar panels, and I am willing to bet you do not even have a tankless water heater.
dannyruxspin 11 months ago
Because...They....Provide....EVIDENCE.
Huh! WEIRD, still no list of world -renowned or at least highly respected scientists from you end.....I'll try and contain my amazement.
You are quite stupid, you know that?
conan1174 11 months ago
GOOD-BYE, dude. You know why I get aggressive? It's because of moronic, assinine statments that go against facts. Not enough articles? what would you like 1,000...10,000....How many? Same with evolution, how many missing links? You can see the transition in, for example, theropod dinosaurs into birds. The advancement of proto feathers into feathers and then into a fully developed wing for flight. It's RIGHT there for you to see. It's obvious where you stand.
Good-bye, GOOD-LUCK.
conan1174 11 months ago
@conan1174 You also assume the only anti-global warming reports are funded by oil companies. So who is funding the pro-side? When it comes to money spent on the opposition you want to know the source. However, when it comes to research backing your claim, how in-depth do you really go? Oh, they are a bunch of do-gooders who just care about humanity.
John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, has been speaking out against this.
God you are cute.
dannyruxspin 11 months ago