WTC Free Fall Rebuttal to dprjones
Uploader Comments (stoobradley)
Top Comments
-
"That require valid reasoning."
ROFL!!
Me make many reason for you. You ignore. Continue ask stupid question. Try sound smart. Fail. Stamp feet in anger!
Video Responses
All Comments (182)
-
I love how things can fall faster than gravity in Chandlers math.
Maybe the govt. installed giant magnets in the courtyard?
-
Conspiracy theories occur at the intersection of dark, personal fantasies and profound, willful self-deceit liberally sprinkled with an assortment of tasty cross-eyed neuroses. There is no room in this fetid concoction for actual facts, evidence, or the truth...at least the sort of truth that the real world generally accepts.
Area 51, the WTC attacks, the crash of TWA 800, both Kennedy assassinations, etc are all fodder for the people who suffer from chronic cognitive dissonance. It's a pity.
-
@AiresQX4 That's completely wrong, and moronic.
-
@autumnsylver your body is 99% or more empty space.. Why haven't you collapsed into a pile of bones?
-
Dpr welcomed the challenge but I haven't seen his rebuttal anywhere.
-
@autumnsylver where is your proof physical evidence and what controlled demolition would leave building 7 laying across the street on 91201 So little research on the physical aftermath has been done by t911truthers that they debunk themselves.
-
@SexyMelon I agree. Not everyone is. Peace love and respect. Now get back to kicking ass friend.
-
@Daddyo930 I don't exclude possibility of governments hiring shills anymore than corporations routinely do, but - honestly - you underestimate just how lifeless people can be, not just on subject of 9/11, but anything from Star Wars to cooking recipes.
-
@SexyMelon As a rational person, I have a hard time believing in coincidence. If you look at the amount of time these same people spend on youtube beating the truth with a bat, you can conclude some things. 1. They are unemployed and looking for a job. 2. They are in complete denial and angry. 3. This is their job. Sherlock Holmes said that once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains however improbable is most likely the answer.
There is not much resistance as the WTC towers fall because they're 95% air, not because there are controlled demolitions ahead of the falling structure, making it "fall better" or whatever it is you're claiming. There is an article in the journal of minerals, metals and materials about it.
And seriously? You think people watching dprjones' video are actually going to think that those two guys are really 9/11 truthers?
autumnsylver 1 year ago
@autumnsylver You are referring to the JOM article by Eagar and Musso, that was long ago debunked by Dr Steven Jones, "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?"
The notion that buildings are "made of air" is silly. Buildings are filled with plenty of empty space, but they are constructed of steel and concrete, and engineered to support many times anticipated loads.
And yes, people who would believe buildings are constructed with air would also likely believe those guys are Truthers.
stoobradley 1 year ago 11