Ben Lowrey vs. Police Chief - Re-stating my case

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
507 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 21, 2011

http://www.benlowrey.com creditors in commerce winston shrout jack smith gordon hall brandon adams robert menard accepted for value A4v john harris commercial redemption free man on the land ben lowrey bashar john demartini zeitgeist fractional reserve money debt fiat alex jones prison planet info wars project camelot TPUC Tim Turner Sam Davis Douglas Riddle Vince Kahn cveitch charlie veitch veronica chapman sovereign republic self determination dean clifford occupy

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (benlowreyhimself)

  • What I've read in dutch law, it's often mentioned that the application or discretion must be "reasonable" in the exercise of their powers.

    But in each instance they will decide what is and is not reasonable, no? Given this, one possibility is to confirm what they themselves expressly do and do not consider "reasonable". It doesn't mean they're going to be consistent about it, so you're going to have to put them in a spot where they are openly contradicting themselves anyway.

  • @mad11red

    thanks

see all

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hows the weather?

  • Great vid! Thanks Ben

  • You could ask the judge if you can make respresentations before him about why your claim should not be struck out. Maybe you put across your arguments better face to face? Justice should not be available only to those skilled with pen and paper.

  • Ben, you have no witnesses, what I was thinking about was that it might be a good idea to get all officers present as witnesses and to submit your video/audio of what happened as evidence!

  • @TRACKWORKS only sensible comment I have read on here.

  • @widowerson I expect if he was a pop star he would. It takes money-lots of money to sue them. So suing them is alot easier said than done for the ordinary non-well heeled individual. Such stupid comments are been posted here. Sounds like they're coming from infant school!

  • @widowerson but they violate people's human and civil rights all the time. And then claim that they were acting within the law. Which they were. So it's the law that allows them to vilate yoiur human and civil rights. The ultimate violation of your human and civil rights is if they lawfully kill you.

  • I'd like to be able to write something funny or witty. Only I don't find them or their puppet masters at all funny.

  • plus on a side note police have a certain amount of immunity. unless they violate your human rights or civil rights

    just my 2 cents good luck

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more