奶茶說:你們(國民黨)不會放棄"南京"吧!?!?!

南京1937@奶茶(劉若英)博命演出

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• 標題
• 01
• 片斷
• 100
• 21
• 46
• 00
• 23
• 18

[undertakerRach]

One of the foundations of the massacre myth is based on the book which is called "What War Means", edited by Harold Timperley. But he was an advisor to the Chinese Nationalist government’s Ministry of Information. The section was propaganda section which was established by KMT (Kuomintang, Chiang Kai-shek) in China during the War. Timperley was paid by the propaganda section for writing the book.

[Rumble578]

@undertakerRach

Kuomintang is a bastard in any case

[OrangeSun15]

@Rumble578 your mother is a prostitute in any case

[undertakerRach]

@leekakuijackson (Part3)The ex-Chinese officers in the presence of Americans and other foreigners confessed looting in Nanking and also that one night they dragged girls into the darkness and the next day blamed Japanese soldiers for the attacks. The ex-officers were arrested and will be punished under martial law and probably executed.

[undertakerRach]

@leekakuijackson (Part2)The professors had, in fact, made the colonel second in authority at the refugee camp. The officers, who had doffed their uniforms during the Chinese retreat from Nanking, were discovered living in one of the college buildings: They confessed their identity after Japanese Army searchers found they had hidden six rifles, five revolvers, a dismounted machine gun and ammunition in the building.

[undertakerRach]

@leekakuijackson ■(Part1)EX-CHINESE OFFICERS AMONG U.S. REFUGEES Colonel and His Aides Admit Blaming the Japanese for Crimes in Nanking　New York Times January 4, 1938 Wireless to the New York Times. SHANGHAI, Jan. 3. American professors remaining at Ginling College in Nanking as foreign members of the Refugee Welfare Committee were seriously embarrassed to discover that they had been harboring a deserted Chinese Army colonel and six of his subordinate officers.



[leekakuijackson]

So, do you think it is that important to prove your stance and to disprove others? Is creating argument something that you think is a way to promote peace and equal right among human races? If yes, I cannot stop you coz it is your stance, yet it is different from mine. After all, I totally don't think that such argument can benefit the human race as a whole.

[leekakuijackson]

@undertakerRach It comes up that our discussion will not come to an end. Someday I may not have time to continue replying your comments. But please, do not take it like "this Chinese cannot justify his stance so he escaped." It is quite sad to know that in your stance, July 7 Incident is another propaganda from China while in the Chinese stance, it is a event created by the Japanese army. This is another incident that we cannot come up with any conclusion, anyway.

[leekakuijackson]

@undertakerRach In fact, Chinese leaders always say to Japanese leaders that Japan should look at history as a mirror. It means that Japan should not forget her brutal actions against China during the Sino-Japanese conflict in the late 1930s and the beginning of the 1940s. --> should not forget...is it equal to repeat itself? Yes, I may not have study as a lot as you do about the war, and I study the war in a Chinese stance. But I am also sure that you study the war in the Japanese stance.

[undertakerRach]

@leekakuijackson (Part5) After the Chinese first attack, Japanese Army adopted a policy of localizing. They kept a no-expansion policy. However, Chinese attacked Japanese again at 3:25 AM. Therefore, Japanese troops finally launched a counterattack against China in July 8, 5:30 AM. In short, Japanese troops launched a counterattack which was started 7 hours later from the first attack.

You should study first and write your comments.

[undertakerRach]

@leekakuijackson (Part4)”There was an article in戦士政治読本, which were war pamphlets. These pamphlets were delivered in area of Chinese Communist in China. The Pamphlets said Liu Shaoqi (劉少奇), he was Chinese guy, started the Marco Polo Incident. Moreover, New York Times, July 8, 1937, (Page1 and 15) said, “300 of Chinese instigators and plain soldiers were trying to do political maneuvering around the Japanese camp.”