36 - Do Plants Use Quantum Effects?

To read along please click the following link http://imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com/2009/05/polls-archive-36-do-pl...

This blog refers to an article published in Discover Magazine in February 2009:
http://discovermagazine.com/2009/feb/13-is-quantum-mechanics-controlling-your...

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• plants
• use
• quantum
• effects
• rob
• bryanton
• tenth
• dimension
• imagining
• memes
• photosynthesis

[valsotto27]

what do you mean by "non-local" ??

[10thdim]

Google non-local and lots of good pages come up.

Non-locality has been proven to exist. Entanglement shows that particles can affect each other instantaneously at great distances, and so on. Watch "Our Non-Local Universe":

watch?v=CBPBc4iZtro

But it gets even stranger than that. Watch "Local Realism Bites the Dust":

watch?v=ehIbaoouPQk

Thanks for writing,

Rob

[PivitalProductions]

no, this makes no sense at all. How would you know anyways ? ¬_¬

[10thdim]

In the description box I've provided the link to the article from Discover magazine that this blog entry used as reference. You can read about the scientists who conducted these experiments there.

Thanks,

Rob

[NebunLaCap]

Your brain calculates everything before hand then your inhibitory neurons cancel out everything except the decision. That can produce a quantum effect perhaps. But your glial cells release a single calcium atom when stimulated. Perhaps for quantum entanglement?

[NebunLaCap]

I read about that. I thought it was already proven though in photosynthesis.

[NebunLaCap]

I read that issue in prison.

[markomanius]

We can't "measure" so we "define" or "describe" it's state by math formulas, then in experiments we use that as a proof that one's particle state can define others particle states... I guess I'm missing something, or most of it, please help.

[markomanius]

So, when you describe it with math formula you are defining a "space" in witch that freehand line is, but that doesn't mean that the whole spiral or wave exists, you've drawn just a short line, you can't use a formula to prove that there is more than just there is. The way I see it same thing goes for this theory of non-locality.

[markomanius]

I really enjoy your videos, it's really brainstorming. However, I don't understandsome of the principles scientist use, the philosophy of mathematics. For instance, if you draw a short curved line freehand and try to describe it or define it, you would probably write some math formula and find out its a piece of a wave or spiral (if it's drawn on some curved surface).

[tombofrog]

Surely there should be an apostrophe in "quantum physics effects"? ahahaha, it's funny that that annoys me

[burchified]

A guy walks into a bar, and end up in an ambulance.