Maurice Grosse vs. Prof Chris Green

Maurice Grosse battles with Chris Green on an old Esther Rantzen show 1998

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Maurice
• Grosse
• Chris
• Green
• Esther
• Rantzen
• Enfield
• Poltergeist

[ames462]

maurice grosse deals with the sceptics here in such a dignified and gentlemanly way.

[22greg48]

Maurice is a legend

[hem0sam]

The real principle that needs the attention is not the perception of what happened but what happened. to even call it a poltergeist already shuts the door for sound logical reasoning becuase it opens belief. the sceptics are attacking Maurices belief instead of focusing on what happened with proof. if you do not have the evidence to debunk something then you can not debunk it.

[STEPHENWRAYSFORD33]

@Kilooscarromeo But if we accept that argument, true it becomes true that there is no case that can even be looked at by anybody who was not there. Somebody could make any old thing up, and nobody would be allowed to question their story, as the person would simply say 'you were not there, which means you have nothing of any value to add'. 'Only by being there would you be able to understand what really happened.' It would be such an easy way of getting out of having to answer any questions.

[Kilooscarromeo]

People trying to explain away events static this & water that. When events such as these take place around an individual. Nobody but, that individual can explain to their best of ability to another exactly," lets say in the right words" for another to get a clear impression of the event. You just cannot get the impact of the event not being there.You have to experience or witness it yourself to get the impact. Those that havn't had anything unusual happen in their lives LET IT STAY THAT WAY

[lordhawksmoor]

i know the guy in the middle but forgotte his name i saw him in a show ''hunted homes'' and i like the guy he's open mined if he sees something that cant explain he accept it then

[suckyamomma30]

Well im not a paranormal investigator so i cant really argue the case but i do have a belief of the paranormal.I always make a point in ANYTHING to keep an open mind.Check out Interview with a Poltergeist on YOUTUBE.

[STEPHENWRAYSFORD33]

You should be careful when saying because someone feels so strongly about something that you are inclined to believe them. Some Christians are 100% sure Jesus was the son of God, many Hindus believe in Lord Krishna, Many Elvis fans claimed to have spotted him all over America and you'll never be able to convince those fans Elvis is dead. Some people who are insane believe they hear voices in their head. I think believing in something because someone else does is not a sensible idea.

[STEPHENWRAYSFORD33]

@suckyamomma30 I'd say Gross was an Empiricist instead of a rationalist. He thought the best way to investigate these strange stories was to go there and look for evidence and get data to later analyse. I'd say that Green was a rationalist as he tried to use reason to solve the problem and avoided supernatural explanations.

[suckyamomma30]

Gross seemed to be a rashional man in my pinion and he felt so strongly about this paranormal activity that it honestly makes me believe him.I know he lost his daughter when he investigated the Enfeild case but i dont think it had any bearing.