i kinda feel that for 2003, people complained about the hulk because this comic wasn't the traditional hulk so people complain i for one love the movie and love the comic
@KaijuKingGojira Well, personally I didn't care for 2003. But I really loved Peter David's stories, they still had that element of sci-fi fun that I felt 2003 lacked. But I can see where your coming from, it certainly had great potential.
@Zazubaar i personally thought that the movie tried to be more physiological then it had to be. And it felt like I were going into the mind of a serial killer rather than Bruce banner.it felt like too Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde mixed with Frankenstein (which is what the hulk is based off of) the problem was it wasn't action packed.But the hulk in 03 version was way stronger then the 08 version.
i kinda feel that for 2003, people complained about the hulk because this comic wasn't the traditional hulk so people complain i for one love the movie and love the comic
KaijuKingGojira 1 month ago
@KaijuKingGojira Well, personally I didn't care for 2003. But I really loved Peter David's stories, they still had that element of sci-fi fun that I felt 2003 lacked. But I can see where your coming from, it certainly had great potential.
Zazubaar 1 month ago
@Zazubaar i personally thought that the movie tried to be more physiological then it had to be. And it felt like I were going into the mind of a serial killer rather than Bruce banner.it felt like too Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde mixed with Frankenstein (which is what the hulk is based off of) the problem was it wasn't action packed.But the hulk in 03 version was way stronger then the 08 version.
KaijuKingGojira 1 month ago
@KaijuKingGojira This is true.
Zazubaar 1 month ago