911 No airplane hit the Pentagon! The truth about Flight 77

http://www.disclose.tv Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has received from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) a security camera recording taken from the Doubletree Hotel in Arlington, Virginia that shows the (faked) 9/11 attack on the Pentagon. This new video evidence, obtained in relation to a Judicial Watch lawsuit against the FBI, seemingly contradicts a sworn FBI affidavit in a related case claiming that the Doubletree security recordings "did not show the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001." STAND UP, AMERICA!

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• bush
• pentagon
• flight
• 77
• airplane
• crash
• new
• world
• order
• illuminati
• september
• 11
• conspiricy

[imaphantom29]

all the comments are @ some one except this one

[konank666]

@74mackd So where's my email from you sending me something to bring me up to speed? I see that you decided to move on to another video with you're idiocy, but still no email.

How come?

[konank666]

@puppetmaster195 Maybe you guys should have a chat. It appears she doesn't think too highly of you...

[konank666]

@puppetmaster195 When did you jump the "truther" ship?

[konank666]

@74mackd With all that said,

"We'll catch you up"

You can email me at uradumbfuk666 at yahoo dot com.

I'm almost peeing my pants in anticipation. This should be nothing short of sheer awesomeness.

[konank666]

@74mackd "That response is wild"

What precisely was wild about? Or is that word another word you don't know either? I was beginning to think about trying to dumb it down for you even further, but you're even struggling with single syllable words now too. Maybe hieroglyphics?

"You really don't have a clue"

This is as funny as it is delusional. But, not quite as much as this:

"Send us your email & we will send you something to get you up to speed"

Or this:

"Thanks for finally admitting it"

[74mackd]

@konank666 That response is wild. You really don't have a clue. Why didn't you say so before? Send us your email and we will send you something to get you up to speed. All you had to say is you don't know anything. We'll catch you up. Thanks for finally admitting it. Don't you feel better?

[konank666]

@74mackd "You just have talking points you heard on youtube"

I wasn't aware of the fact that the NIST report was considered talking points on Youtube or that the basic physics principle of force was either.

Needless to say, I'm not the least bit surprised that you don't know the difference. That's what makes you such a special brand of retard.

[konank666]

@74mackd "You must be able to reproduce the results"

It's already been reproduced.

"If the results cannot be duplicated, then the data is corupt"

Umm, no that's not the case at all.

"You not knowing that confirms our initial suspicions"

Oh good, now you're just making shit up again. Although I must say, I didn't have any suspicions at all. I knew right off the bat that you were nothing more than a babbling retard. Everything you've posted since then has confirmed this

[74mackd]

@konank666 You must be able to reproduce the results. Thats a bed rock rule of science. If the results cannot be duplicated, then the data is corupt.. Men of science all subscribe to this way of thinking. It is part of the scientific method. All results must be able to be reproduced. You not knowing that confirms our initial suspicions. You dont know what your talking about. You have not done any research. You just have talking points you heard on youtube.