Moonhoax: who are the hoaxers?

The moonhoax conspiracy theorists. Who are they? How many can be called 'hoaxer'? Guess what.... there are about 45 of them. That's all. I hesitated making this video. Just because there are 45 delusional users of YouTube that shout "fake!" when they hear the word 'Apollo'? There is a group of hardcore conspiracists, roughly being the twenty mentioned in my video. The hardcore guys. The 'cream' of YouTube. Yeah.
And uh....sorry man, if your nick isn't mentioned. Shout some more "proppagandissts" or "appologists".
Special thanks to Kaleljordankent for letting me use one of his pictures.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• moonhoax

[dvaidr]

That is the most boring vid I've ever seen. Even the music is boring.

[Rob260259]

@dvaidr

Still you watched some of it. Thank you for your bright words of wisdom.

[markandrach]

i think it goes deeper than the moon with these fantasists,they will all believe every conspiracy going.its an anti government agenda they all seem to have.

i find their replies amusing,not only do they choose to ignore the facts they resort to play ground tactics of mud slinging and name calling.

the classic signs of someone on their back foot

good vid rob

[Rob260259]

@markandrach

Yep, you're right. Many of these distrusters believe the world is run by schizophrenic shadowy and dominating organizations, Freemasons, Illuminati, Kinghts of Templar, Bilderberg Group etc.

They probably do a daily surveillance in their house, searching for pinhole cameras and microphones. I think it has something to do with some kind of pschological tendency for many people to think that all major events are orchestrated by some dark and significant organization.

[CNN911Fakes]

Fascinating, sort of like watching a TV show you hate, right? In any event, I am not so familiar with the accounts you mention other than Jarrah White's excellent chanel (although I think he spends far too much time complaining) and ArcAngel4Myke, whose account you spelled correctly in the video, but incorrectly (added an "s":) in your comment above

The few video uploads of ArcAngel4Myke that I have seen and checked the NASA source on have been faithful to the source.. What would be a hoaxer?

[Rob260259]

@CNN911Fakes

ArcAngel4Myke (I corrected my fault, thank you); he's worse. Absolutely ridiculous. Why is commenting on his outrageous videos disabled?

"What would be a hoaxer?"

- Hoaxers appear to be presenting topics that have been dealt with by others, in great detail. They seldom provide explanation, substance, or methodology.

Many hoaxers follow these 3 steps:

1. base your 'proof' on unsupported claims

2. use NASA material to prove the hoax

3. never trust NASA material that says it was true

[musicbruv]

Good work Rob, I am very impressed.

[Rob260259]

@adiohead

"...or haven't noticed?"

Please Adiohead, go tell them all. Please do. I couldn't care less about those reactions and about their complaining.

Accusing people of murder, without a shread of microscopic evidence, that should be reason for a complaint.

So go ahead, wake up all your hoaxheaded friends.

[CNN911Fakes]

@Rob260259 Thanks for your thoughtful reply. I disagree with ArcAngel4Myke's position on ratings and comments, but I fully understand why he would take that approach.

I do not censor in any way on my own video uploads and love all ratings, good or bad. In fact, my most popular videos are rated pretty low - mostly based, I suspect, on my atrocious video creating skills!

So, thanks again for a thoughtul reply.

[Rob260259]

The hoaxers: adiohead, arcangel4myke, astroclownbuster, aurinkohirvi, awe130, gijsshu, cosmored, ed11561, egmag, fanbutton, foosmasoos, greenmagoos, hunchbacked, johnsenkenn, mooninquirer, michaelstmark, nasafakedit, nekotech, t1gard, sergemck, stalkervision, straydog02, timrocket, un4g1v3nl, user17v, wengsky01, whitejarrah, wsee.

[Rob260259]

@CNN911Fakes

Do you know the website Clavius Moonbase and ApolloHoax . net? Do you wonder why people like Jarrah do not show up there? Because mister White has always preferred to stay in his little walled garden where he can bask in the attention of his adoring group of fans, not having to face any real opposition. I think you know what would happen if he ever had to defend his theories in a mainstream forum against people who actually know what they're talking about.

[Rob260259]

@CNN911Fakes

Jarrah delves into subjects that are quite clearly the domain of long-studied expertise, but he doesn't tell how he acquired the expertise necessary to sustain his conclusions. This is intolerable when the conclusions he draws differ so dramatically from the rest of the world's. He makes videos because he likes making videos, not because there's any scientifically redeeming value to them. He was invited to present his findings to REAL experts, but he ignored it.

[Rob260259]

@CNN911Fakes

"excellent chanel".. Excuse me? Yes, Jarrah maybe Youtube-famous' but in the real world he simply doesn't appear on the radar. To anyone with real expertise, Jarrah is a joke. He patently doesn't know what he's talking about, and he steadfastly refuses to engage the world's experts in open debate. I think the literary term is "howling from the shadows."