The 9/11 Commission Report Was A Criminal Coverup To Avoid An Open Public Investigation

The commission's conclusions and recommendations should be totally rejected. Its story is full of lies, distortions and omissions of fact. Following are two of the more than 40 reasons why the official story about what happened on 9/11 is untrue.

First, who were the hijackers? We do not know. None of those named appear on any of the passenger lists released by the airlines. Most important, six of the men named by the government are still alive and have never even been to the United States. We know that because European media (as reported by The Associated Press, the London Telegraph and the BBC) have interviewed them. It is not a matter of mistaken identity not being noticed or someone using a false passport. The commission insists that the people they named were the hijackers but that claim is demonstrably false.

If that most basic claim is false, and the information was available to the commission (which it was), and the commission still claims that it has given us "a full account" of what happened that day based on "exacting research," it's clear that the members are lying. In his book, "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions," Dr. David Ray Griffin documents all that and concludes the whole report is one long lie.

Second, in the months after 9/11 all of the surviving New York City Fire Department personnel who were on the scene were interviewed. Those oral histories were recorded and withheld from the public until Aug. 15, 2005. Only after losing in court three times did the city of New York finally release them. All 503 are now posted on The New York Times Web site. Why did the city fight so hard to keep them from the public?

It turns out those oral histories reveal details about what was happening in the World Trade Center buildings that are completely inconsistent with the tale told by the commission. Dozens of firefighters and medics reported hearing, seeing and feeling explosives going off in the buildings that collapsed. Why were there explosives, very powerful explosives by all accounts, going off in the buildings? More disturbing, why was the pattern of those explosives identical in some important ways with the pattern used in a planned implosion (or controlled demolition of a building)?

In spite of Connelly's faith in what commission members say, the report seems to be an obvious cover-up. The question that we all need to ask is: What is the commission covering up? 9/11 was, in fact, an inside job!

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• 911
• Sept
• 11th
• September
• 11
• 2001
• Commission
• Thomas
• Kean
• McCain
• Lieberman
• DHS
• Inside
• Job
• Coverup
• Demolition
• Pentagon
• Rumsfeld
• Bush
• Iran-Contra
• Irancontrascumdid911
• Implosion
• Explosion
• NIST
• FOIA
• Release
• South
• Tower
• Strike
• Drone
• Taliban
• Unocal
• Clinton
• CIA
• Israel
• Mossad
• Cheney
• Saddam
• Iraq
• Afghanistan
• Obama
• Osama
• Bin
• Laden
• KSM
• Zelikow
• Torture
• Gitmo

[b07rivera]

the debunking 911 dot com website

what do you guys think about this website & its way of debunking your conspiracy theories?

[IranContraScumDid911]

@b07rivera I do not have a conspiracy theory. You think Bin Laden did this? That is a conspiracy theory.

[GONECRUISING72]

best video yet i agree with, segrum, its all about the asbestos..... but what do u make of dimitri khalezov who says there were nukes planted under each of the buildings i'm not saying i agree just wondering what other ppl's take is

[IranContraScumDid911]

@GONECRUISING72 I do not follow or believe his theory. It fails scientific observation.It has valid points but it disregards the decending sequence of small explosions we see as each floor blown out. WTC 7 was not blown up in a nuke, it was a good old fashioned implosion. The towers were more technical, explosion and implosion. Why use a mini-nuke when RDX is quieter and much more controlled? I support him because he makes people think about 9/11, and rejects the official story. Nukes? No

[WulfBand]

The Commission needs to be brought up on Charges for:

Conspiracy to Overthrow our Government

Title 18 Section 1918

[tabletalk33]

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.

[MsJoy4ever]

I just got finished reading the 911 commission report on my kindle, lies, lies lies !

9/11 was an inside job !!!!!!!!!!

[DutchsMaria]

I am starting to believe that 911 happened to MASK the taking down of building 7 and the destruction of its content!

[JonRevere]

There's more to 9/11 than controlled demolition theories. We need to remember this and focus on other aspects. It's the truth movement, not the controlled demolition movement.

[JonRevere]

Why no mention of the 9/11 report neglecting to mention the Pakistani ISI's involvement with the attacks? Or how the 9/11 report exonnerated Saudi Arabia? Or how Philip Zelikow had a draft of the report written up before research began? Or how he was a close friend of Condi rice? Google "They Tried to Warn Us", hosted on Historycommons. You will be shocked.

[bland229]

@b07rivera You still believe the Pancake THEORY? It sounds like you are the Conspiracy THEORISTS in this thread. Truthers prefer to subscribe to the LAWS of Physics and Gravity! Start your education here......

watch?v=9YRUso7Nf3s

If you can find any Scientific Experiments demonstrating how your THEORY could have possibly happened, quite wasting your time and go argue someone about Obamacare or something else you might have a shot of winning!

Thanks,

Daniel Edd Bland III