Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The NASA 2012 leak

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
131,520
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 14, 2012

By unknown reason, NASA seems to allow a leak of images, that now is
possible to copy directly from theyr server. Here are a few
intreasting, and more will come. Seems like NASA starts to "open theyr
doors" a little?

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • People have already commented correctly on the camera being on remote control and pictures of space debris are hardly evidence of aliens. Many people have no idea how much junk is in orbit around the earth currently.

  • I was watching a program today call "Fact or Faked" the interesting part of the whole thing was according to someone doing his own investigative film said that NASA destroyed all of the original footage of the first Moon landing that in itself was very intersting according to him this is what he was told because of budgetary cuts.

see all

All Comments (295)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 1:Space debris

    2:Lightening storms over the sea

    3:Remote control

    4:Your an idiot

  • OMG people really do believe that the Lunar missions were faked... hahahahaha idiots. Gullible idiots.... whatever, I guess they can believe we didn't go to the moon, that the world will end Dec 21 2012, that Bill Gates is giving his money away if you repost a post on FB, or that some rich guy in Africa is giving you his money if you give him your checking account info...... these same people are the reason why we have disclaimers on everything, trying to idiot proof everything....

  • @saturnx311 Look carefully at the way the "lander" takes off. You can see it wobble as though brought up with a wire! That thing didn't have all the fuel on board, according to NASA, to land itself and all it was supposedly carrying. And then take off again! Where was all this fuel stored? Haha!!!

  • That takeoff is already proven to be a fake. This whole scene was shot under the direction of Stanley Kubrick, the pioneer of special film effects. The film technology of the day would not have stood up to the solar radiation. All the media footage from Apollo was faked.

    Look directly beneath the craft at the landscape. Isn't it odd there is absolutely no blast pit? That thing would have blasted out a huge hole as it landed. This thing was lowered by crane. FAKE!

  • A remote

  • just for a second lets say we are the only ones. then god made all them planets and space just for us? then why do we wast our time fighting eachother instead of spending all that $ on space programs. (FYI i dont belive we are the only ones)

  • you mean we could send men to the moon but couldnt invent the technology to remotely control the camera to follow the ship? whats wrong with you?

  • It was controlled manually from mission control. Just the slightest bit of research would've revealed that.

  • it was the force of the thrusters pushing the camera, the camera must have then hit a rock or something coursing it to aim upwards 

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more