Atheists are losing it

I favorite a video not long ago about radiometric testing. A lovely scientist explain in basic layman terms how basically it work, to my astonishment a subscriber tells me the comment section of the video shoots down the video. I almost forgot the level of denial and absurdity of Atheist, but it reminded me of the sheer insanity these people will go to deny heck anything that doesn't support their religion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ErgdpG_N9vQ

http://www.asanet.org/press/20060503.cfm

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• atheist
• atheism
• religion
• radiometric
• testing
• C14
• denial

[Aleksamson]

Wow, I've seen some stupid christian, but this is beyond. It has nothing to do with religion or atheism. This is just plane crazy.

Hey you-younho100. I work for Satan & I told him about you. He's very angry.Ur gonna see his power. Demons are coming for you tonight after midnight.You are doomed,utter desrtuction awaits You. The only protection for U is to put crosses on your door,window,arround your bed & allover the place. More / safer

[younhol00]

@Aleksamson Of course atheist works for satan they are both in the same even though is a contradiction in terms.

[hailbopp]

Stupid people think that everyone who disagrees with them is "insane".

[moopism]

You're an idiot.

[highlander7]

Look up Ken Miller's video about the Dover Trial in Pennsylvania. He is a Christian and a biologist. If you have an open mind you'll check it out. If you have a closed mind you will remain ignorant. Ball is in your court. The video is just under 2 hours long.

Modern biology is based on evolution.

[HonoredAPTD]

Atheists do not need evidence to scientifically prove God doesn't exist. The absence of scientifical evidence claiming God exists means he doesn't exist.

[1tabligh]

@csmcmillion God and Empirical Logic.

One of the most destructive and misleading factors in thoughts concerning God is to restrict one's thought to the "logic" of the empirical sciences and to *fail* to recognize the *limits* and boundaries of that "logic".

Is that which is necessary in essence and which is considered the first source of existence matter itself or something else beyond the limits of matter?

[csmcmillion]

@1tabligh > How can you delude yourself and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves

Deluding myself? Not quite. Fundamental particles materialize all the time - it's simply a matter of Energy to Mass conversion. Once those particles exist the formation of the heavier elements occurs via natural processes. The question (that still must be answered) is where all the energy came from...

[1tabligh]

@csmcmillion Before he enters the realm of science and knowledge with all its concerns, man is able to perceive certain truths by means of these innate perceptions. But after entering the sphere of science and philosophy and filling his *brain* with various proofs and deductions, he may forget his natural and innate perceptions or begin to doubt them. It is for this reason that when man moves beyond his innate nature to delineate a belief, differences begin to appear.

[1tabligh]

@csmcmillion Let me guess

__

Umm!

So much science for this brainless pseudo-Scientific Demagogue!

Hiding your ignorance and arrogance behind your stupid pretext of "Let me guess"!

Dodging ALL the questions and quibbling in vain!

How can you delude yourself and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?