Top Comments
All Comments (67)
-
This is in better condition than the 1935 Seymour Hicks version.
-
This was very good. Great clean print for 1901.
-
@lundehund44 Why do you need music to it?
-
that was really interesting , but i'm amazed to see the term 'xmas' used so early on , i've always thought it much later !!!!!!
-
michael bay...eat ur heart out
-
Pretty amazing when you consider this came out less than 60 years after the original book came out.
-
It is wild, to see people moving around on film, who lived over a hundred years ago !
-
lundehund44 it's a silent movie
-
Hey, BFI, would it kill you to add music to this clip?
-
I'm the actual discoverer of this film. I found it whilst working for The North West Film Archive, then a part of what was Manchester Polytechnic (now Manchester Metropolitan University) in the early '80s. The film somehow found its way, with other old films, to an antiques/junk shop in Wigan and I went to see what was in the collection. It took me probably less than a minute to realise it was something special. To my knowledge it's the only surviving copy in existence.
I LOVE IT! I think it was great timing to post this on YouTube today. I think this is the week Disney will be releasing Dickens Christmas Carol in 3d this weekend. From the earliest version to the very latest in a sweep.
talfacprez 2 years ago 25
absolutely AMAZING!!!!
rhomo 2 years ago 19