Top Comments
All Comments (50)
-
I believe I would have been very happy during Indus Valley age than in the present modern Indian era !
-
@Dzongka Thank you
-
@ganesanhari They were Dravidian. You are correct.
-
The Muslims are trying to distort the history of Indus valley being a vedic, they also try to distort the lie of mauryan empire saying it never existed.
-
actually the vedas describe about the sarawathi river in all its might but it dried up 6000 years ago which means the vedas were there when the river existed and there is no such thing as aryan invasion it has been proven false and there are figures of horses cows and other sacred animals to prove a cultural continuity since a long long time....
-
will u all shut up and not make this video issue between india and pakistan and let us enjoy the vid???
-
The history of the Indus does not belong to 'India' or 'Pakistan'. It belongs to those who are descended from those people, wherever they may be living today.
Btw, to my knowledge, the Vedas have no connection to the Harappans. Any ideas?
-
@ganesanhari im sure they are older then vedic, but that doesnt mean they aren't related, they are pre vedic, there is NO EVIDENCE, nor acheological nor genetic for any invasion, you need to stop following made up racist 19th century eupropean theories.
@Truth987Seeker ahahahahaha, sorry son, there was no pakistan before 1947 and your ancestosrs like it or not are converetd hindus - indus valley belongs to vedic civilisation of india.
indrajeet 7 months ago 15
@subroto81 actually bro, pakistan are 75% punjabi ethnicity, most are descended from converted hindus and buddhists, bastardised urdu language is 60-70% hindi based, lol pakis dont even have their own real langauge aahahahahahaha
indrajeet 7 months ago 4