Stephen Hawking gives a lecture on the Hawking-Hartle no boundary universe.
Lecture given to a sold out crowd at the Berkeley on March 13 2007.
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/haw...
Stephen Hawking gives a lecture on the Hawking-Hartle no boundary universe.
Lecture given to a sold out crowd at the Berkeley on March 13 2007.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
I'd also like to point out that I'm not a theological, fingers-in-both0ears sort of person. I don't believe in omni-anything because an omni-anything being is a logical fallacy. There's never ever been a cosmologist/physicist as big/brilliant as Stephen Hawking, Einstein, or Penrose that has ever 100% denied a form or higher consciousness. If you look up interviews of Hawking he clearly holds an agnostic point of view based mostly in science.
The truth is, you can't even prove to me that YOU exist and are anything more than a figment of my imagination. I could be dreaming all of this crap or in a simulation. Like Hawking said anyway..we can only observe that which is within our universe because we do not live in any other universe. Quantum Mechanics still isn't a complete model either, and his buddy Penrose is currently questioning ALL of quantum theory..saying it's absurd and offers more confusion than answers.
"God" could've very well arisen from a singularity. Consciousness is either A: Governed by complex electric impulses or B. Governed by complex electric impulses that are governed by quantum particles/thought. Don't ask who created "God" is an annoying counter-point to theological arguments. Even plants have nociceptors/feel pain. Stop ASSUMING that something has to be as complex as a human being to be conscious or be influential to it's surroundings.
I only wish humanity had more men like him, more of his cleverness and high iq... and of course less of these fools who believe in gods and gods and gods....
no one. he is the only one rather than that even thinkin about that is a big sin so i won`t let ur bug get in my head. but GOD is the only one the creator of everyfin that exists.
Right. . . that must be it. . . .He created us, because were too complicated to arise from any other means, yet God (who must be more complicated then us) wasn't created?
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
But you cannot prove it does not exist right?
So ppl will always believe in god.
That man's bowel movements are more intelligent than me.