Steve Forbes: Bernanke out. Ron Paul for chairman of the Federal Reserve - SchiffRadio Exclusive!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
15,739
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 20, 2012

The Peter Schiff Show with special guest Steve Forbes
Live from Charleston South Carolina - January 20th 2012
Follow me on Twitter @SchiffRadio
Friend me on Facebook.com/PeterSchiff

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @Amyls64

    Yes, I get that, but what I don't understand is how can anyone possibly be against his foreign policies. He is against unnecessary offensive wars. How can you dislike that ? Don't you understand that any war US is involved gets Federal reserve printing insane amounts of dollars, which inflates your currency even more ? Not to mention war with Iran would sky rocket gas prices all around the world. And for what ? Because some neo-cons are insecure about their dick size ?

  • I don't care if Romney has money. I DO care when he attempts to use that money to buy the office of presidency!

    Ron Paul 2012

see all

All Comments (178)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ron Paul for FED chair is a great idea though!

  • I'm a Libertarian but I do think that there should be a hefty inheritance tax. If someone doesn't work for the money they have, they don't appreciate it, they don't understand the value of hard work, and it will snow ball into a massive amount of wealth that allows them oligarchical powers over other not-so-lucky citizens.

    One the one hand inheritances promote economic inequality while on the other hand the person who has passed should be able to do what they want with their money. It's tricky

  • Steve Forbes also did not see the bubble.

  • Peter .... One thing I might suggest ... Your comments at the end about Democrats implies that the other party can do something better ... But the book "Grand Illusion: The Myth of Voter Choice in a Two-Party Tyranny" by Theresa Amato suggests we need to be sensitive. We definitely do not want to propagate this illusion that the democrat or republicans have any answers. Economic policy just doesn't change as you well know with either party.

  • @movieklump these financial people are too disconnected, its all charts and economic laws to them.

  • Bashing China? Listening to these filthy rich talk is sickening. China pays it's workers a pittance and their working conditions are so bad they commit suicide. But these fat cats ignore this. Also many restrictions on business in "civilized" countries are environmental. China's environment is a catastrophe awaiting to happen. Why does Schiff interview this idiot? Because his daddy gave him money, pathetic.

  • Apparently Forbes & Schiff want to deliberately ignore the truth about China: the wage for a day in China can't buy you 2 meals a day. Ever. Not in North America. Ever. That means it's impossible to remove regulations and wages to bring jobs back. It can't be done or people would die on the job of starvation.

  • you idiots, Ron Paul already has clarified his forein policies, and your still misrepresenting what he said, you need to hook up with main stream and act like all your listoners are stupid

  • @AlexanderLee1 I agree. Wiping off a regime is very different than wiping off a country, meaning the population. Threatened by US´ and Israels gov with death and destruction, this reaction is understandable.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more