Mac OS x86 10.4.8 Tiger vs. Windows XP SP2

Mac OS x86 10.4.8 Tiger and Windows XP SP2 are starting on similar machines.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• mac
• os
• x86
• windows
• win
• xp
• leopard
• vista
• speed
• cs
• nx7400
• hp
• toshiba
• a100
• oulu

[lutcherboy86]

THIS IS POINTLESS!!!!!!!!1

[jessemrk]

I'm a switcher. Once you get a Mac, you will NEVER go back !

[pp2devane]

Not wanting to sound boring but you do realise Hacintosh IS illegal?

[CometMcfest]

@aribenzane That's because people like you fuck it up with malware and cracked software, and don't use it like a normal person.

[FaceTheVenom]

Should have done it on the same PC..

[tthiago95]

faz contra o sevem[

[mickyd110011]

did the wifi work on the osx86 project computer?

[stopmotionsextreme]

@Purerockband Windows XP Takes a minute to boot then it's crazy fast

[MEGA714]

one "small" problem... the mac is running in that illegal osx86 thing which lets you run mac os-on a pc. and, SIMMILAR MACHINES, not fair test! and Max OS 10.4.8 Tiger is loads newer than xp.

[wangzheyou]

Mac i Like

[stefanow94]

Mac beats :)

[hvrock13]

@thatskai And XP just has to load thousands upon thousands of scattered dll files. And it's all the fragments of files all over the hard drive. Mac format is way better. Tell me, do you only say that Mac's are inferior because they don't play games? I've got a feeling thats exactly it. Most overused "insult" ever, in the case of computers anyway.