Dr Ian Plimer vs Dr Duane Gish - 1988 Sydney, Australia Debate [Part 10 of 16]

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
658 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 16, 2009

This is the unedited 3hr debate that took place in Sydney, Australia in 1988.


Dr Ian Plimer
Geologist and skeptic

vs.

Dr Duane Gish
Biochemist and creationist

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Nah, it's just that dumb people are louder.

  • I don't think you would characterize Gish as an intellectual.

    He had totally demolished the garbage Gish was spouting. I think Plimer was totally justified to point out both the dangers of letting creationists into schools, and their questionable motives for wanting to spread their nonsense.

    And he is viscerally disgusted by Gish. So am I.

see all

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Bertrandization Gish is a brilliant Phd scientist. Fact!

  • Bah.  Do you even google refutations to your own worthless arguments before spewing them at the world?

  • @beriukay GISH is a legend...We only see left handed amino acids when proteins are present..but proteins only form when u have LEFT HANDED AMINO ACIDS!!..Paradox....so how can life happen through a evolution process from simple chemicals and molecules, impossible.now science says crystals brought life here.thats not a testable science its a faith based assumption..all man can do is play with life and take pre existing information and rearranged it

  • @technicallyabsurd GISH is a legend...We only see left handed amino acids when proteins are present..but proteins only form when u have LEFT HANDED AMINO ACIDS!!..Paradox....so how can life happen through a evolution process from simple chemicals and molecules, impossible.now science says crystals brought life here.thats not a testable science its a faith based assumption..all man can do is play with life and take pre existing information and rearranged it

  • Plimer didn't put himself off well, as all. This is a prime example of how you DON'T debate with creationists.

  • Plimer is embarassing, personal attacks (such as "you do this only for the money") don't belong to intellectual debates.

  • I think the crowd is a little biased...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more