Dr Ian Plimer vs Dr Duane Gish - 1988 Sydney, Australia Debate [Part 10 of 16]
Top Comments
All Comments (9)
-
@Bertrandization Gish is a brilliant Phd scientist. Fact!
-
Bah. Do you even google refutations to your own worthless arguments before spewing them at the world?
-
@beriukay GISH is a legend...We only see left handed amino acids when proteins are present..but proteins only form when u have LEFT HANDED AMINO ACIDS!!..Paradox....so how can life happen through a evolution process from simple chemicals and molecules, impossible.now science says crystals brought life here.thats not a testable science its a faith based assumption..all man can do is play with life and take pre existing information and rearranged it
-
@technicallyabsurd GISH is a legend...We only see left handed amino acids when proteins are present..but proteins only form when u have LEFT HANDED AMINO ACIDS!!..Paradox....so how can life happen through a evolution process from simple chemicals and molecules, impossible.now science says crystals brought life here.thats not a testable science its a faith based assumption..all man can do is play with life and take pre existing information and rearranged it
-
Plimer didn't put himself off well, as all. This is a prime example of how you DON'T debate with creationists.
-
Plimer is embarassing, personal attacks (such as "you do this only for the money") don't belong to intellectual debates.
-
I think the crowd is a little biased...
Nah, it's just that dumb people are louder.
beriukay 2 years ago 6
I don't think you would characterize Gish as an intellectual.
He had totally demolished the garbage Gish was spouting. I think Plimer was totally justified to point out both the dangers of letting creationists into schools, and their questionable motives for wanting to spread their nonsense.
And he is viscerally disgusted by Gish. So am I.
Bertrandization 2 years ago 3