Scientific evidence for thermitic materials at the World Trade Center is discussed, and an experiment in production and ignition of nanothermite is performed.
Wow I found a place where intelligent people are discussing things. So if we take the step that 9/11 was not what it appears, and you can get some good information from Alex Jones, plus they just released a documentary on OKC bombing and Eric Holder was Attorney General in OKC or assistant.. Should we not fear anyone getting in there but Ron Paul.. we need to defund all these people who are shipping guns down and drugs back. California Sheriffs Threaten Feds For Usurping the Constitution! watch
Just poor kero on a beam and light it up and see if the original report stands up. It wont do shit you could put kero on it all day long. Ive seen cars lit up with fuel of a much higher flash point on garbage dumps and extreme heat and still not lose form apart from interior and tyres but the shape of the thin metal is still all in form. Anyone can do an experiment at home with Kero (Jet Fuel) and a thin Piece of metal over a steel bucket. Then you will see what it wasn't
@baguazhang2 Wow, you wrote your own book? May I ask what the title is, and who your publisher was? I've been looking for a publisher myself, not that my ideas are coherant enough to be jotted down a book. Maybe in the future.
I understand your hesitation on the phenomena of the towers collapse: What I've found is that the conventional demolition theory is only unable to explain a mere TWO facts: The massive temperatures found in the WTC foundations, and 70% of their structures being dustified.
policy documents, foreknowledge from 13 different countries and from similar failed attacks, NORAD (with no focus on the wargames), official documents pertaining to our energy policy and projected energy requirements...etc. These kinds of subjects. A good introduction is to read the 9/11 Timeline, and a good intro book is Michael Ruppert's "Crossing the Rubicon". I research only means, motive, and opportunity, so unfortunately I don't have an opinion regarding kill mechanism.
I know you'd like a hard answer from me, but I personally refuse to speculate on any of the physical evidence after engaging in nearly a decade of debates over it and having it all lead to nothing. What I have looked into, and written a 180 page book about (with 500 references from books, newspapers, and political documents) is the history of US involvement in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the surrounding countries since the end of the Soviet Afghan War, pipeline politics, US foreign
@baguazhang2 Good to see someone else going into depth with the physics of the WTC collapses. I myself have been researching it extensively, and I concur that the impact force of the planes and the intensitys of the fires would be well below what was needed to bring them down.
'I believe in government complicity, but don't subscribe to the theories of bombs or thermite in the tower.' Hmm, then What Are your thoughts on the kill mechanism employed against the towers?
Please be careful when creating and posting videos like this; there are some that may consider your experiment an illegal act of bomb-making... Just sayin...
It was not designed to handle a plane going 180 mph, or lost in the fog. It was most certainly designed to withstand the impact from a plane traveling at over 600 miles per hour. I doubt the validity of your calculations. Did you take into account heat capacity of all the materials? I confined the fire to one half of one floor, removed cooling cross currents, and removed fireproofing.
For example, as a graduate engineer I've done the thermodynamic calculations to show that the maximum temperature the steel beams would reach under the worst conditions is 280 degrees Celsius. I've also calculated that the kinetic energy and damage of the planes that hit the towers was LESS than what Skilling designed them to withstand. However, despite all this evidence it proves absolutely nothing. You people are chasing the wrong thing.
Wow I found a place where intelligent people are discussing things. So if we take the step that 9/11 was not what it appears, and you can get some good information from Alex Jones, plus they just released a documentary on OKC bombing and Eric Holder was Attorney General in OKC or assistant.. Should we not fear anyone getting in there but Ron Paul.. we need to defund all these people who are shipping guns down and drugs back. California Sheriffs Threaten Feds For Usurping the Constitution! watch
iondetox 1 month ago
Just poor kero on a beam and light it up and see if the original report stands up. It wont do shit you could put kero on it all day long. Ive seen cars lit up with fuel of a much higher flash point on garbage dumps and extreme heat and still not lose form apart from interior and tyres but the shape of the thin metal is still all in form. Anyone can do an experiment at home with Kero (Jet Fuel) and a thin Piece of metal over a steel bucket. Then you will see what it wasn't
Stringyheads 1 month ago
@baguazhang2 Wow, you wrote your own book? May I ask what the title is, and who your publisher was? I've been looking for a publisher myself, not that my ideas are coherant enough to be jotted down a book. Maybe in the future.
I understand your hesitation on the phenomena of the towers collapse: What I've found is that the conventional demolition theory is only unable to explain a mere TWO facts: The massive temperatures found in the WTC foundations, and 70% of their structures being dustified.
TheJamesrocket 2 months ago
@TheJamesrocket
policy documents, foreknowledge from 13 different countries and from similar failed attacks, NORAD (with no focus on the wargames), official documents pertaining to our energy policy and projected energy requirements...etc. These kinds of subjects. A good introduction is to read the 9/11 Timeline, and a good intro book is Michael Ruppert's "Crossing the Rubicon". I research only means, motive, and opportunity, so unfortunately I don't have an opinion regarding kill mechanism.
baguazhang2 2 months ago
@TheJamesrocket
I know you'd like a hard answer from me, but I personally refuse to speculate on any of the physical evidence after engaging in nearly a decade of debates over it and having it all lead to nothing. What I have looked into, and written a 180 page book about (with 500 references from books, newspapers, and political documents) is the history of US involvement in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the surrounding countries since the end of the Soviet Afghan War, pipeline politics, US foreign
baguazhang2 2 months ago
@baguazhang2 Good to see someone else going into depth with the physics of the WTC collapses. I myself have been researching it extensively, and I concur that the impact force of the planes and the intensitys of the fires would be well below what was needed to bring them down.
'I believe in government complicity, but don't subscribe to the theories of bombs or thermite in the tower.' Hmm, then What Are your thoughts on the kill mechanism employed against the towers?
TheJamesrocket 2 months ago
THERMITE PAINT! I KNOW I was a NAVY SEAL!
Dionysus187 4 months ago
Please be careful when creating and posting videos like this; there are some that may consider your experiment an illegal act of bomb-making... Just sayin...
gaarack 4 months ago
@iSunTzu
It was not designed to handle a plane going 180 mph, or lost in the fog. It was most certainly designed to withstand the impact from a plane traveling at over 600 miles per hour. I doubt the validity of your calculations. Did you take into account heat capacity of all the materials? I confined the fire to one half of one floor, removed cooling cross currents, and removed fireproofing.
baguazhang2 4 months ago
For example, as a graduate engineer I've done the thermodynamic calculations to show that the maximum temperature the steel beams would reach under the worst conditions is 280 degrees Celsius. I've also calculated that the kinetic energy and damage of the planes that hit the towers was LESS than what Skilling designed them to withstand. However, despite all this evidence it proves absolutely nothing. You people are chasing the wrong thing.
baguazhang2 4 months ago