Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

WTC collapse, ABC, 9/11, 22:40

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
42,858
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 29, 2007

WTC collapse, ABC, 9/11, 22:40

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Are you seriously going to use the term "vaporize" when planes impacted the buildings? Fragments of the liners flew out the other end some of which has landed on the floor. But if you like, I can debunk each theory with you using facts and science. You do realize that this wasnt the first terrorist attack on U.S. soil.

  • No, what was shocking about 9/11 was the fact that two of the Worlds tallest buildings, had been Assaulted by Planes, people watched in horrid, of other people jumping out, to not suffer a Worse death, then what was coming to them, People watched this repeat, as a 2nd plane smacked into the other building on INTERNATIONAL television. People watched in horror, as a damaged towers, tumbled down in less than 10-12 seconds each. And the world could do nothing. I would be alittle bit stoned.....yep.

see all

All Comments (91)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @dirtydetox

    How convenient; same arguments spouted for 5 years.

    "nano-thermite" is the result of Jones et al's fantasy "thermite" samples. There are loads of other compounds that could be attributed to different materials. Harrit et al didn't take this into consideration. The paper tried to squeeze everything that Jones and Harrit wanted into a little corner. No wonder it doesn't stand against scrutiny. My professor even once used it as an example of how NOT to write a scientific paper.

  • @AceofDlamonds Devices? NIST DIDN'T test for explosives conveniently, which seems pretty strange considering the circumstances, Nano-thermite (a developing military technology) is a high tech relatively silent incendiary which produces molten iron as a by-product (see the multiple accounts of huge pools of molten metal present in the clear up for MONTHS afterwards)

  • inside job believers are the result of handjobs

  • @punishalltrolls

    LMAO! did you just say many engineers and PHYSICIANS question the official story? How long is this bullshit gonna last. There are 1500 prominent people in AE9/11, only 1500. And of them, approximately 11 are qualified structural engineers. Physicians study medicine, not physics. How do the laws of physics contradict the official story? If anything, the laws of physics fit quite well. Now how the hell does a demolition get set up so fast and fall so QUIETLY? explain...

  • @AceofDlamonds the laws of physics contradict the official story. science is on the conspiracy side.

    many engineers and physicians question the official story anyway.

  • @godzilla1077 debunked by whom? MANY inside job theories. that's plural.

  • @xcited4vids Here have a link... Watch at 1:37 and a few other places you can see it happened at both towers. Collumns remain standing a few seconds longer than the walls.

    /watch?v=0TqqzOCPmRE&feature=r­elated

  • @xcited4vids actually correct watch a vid of the second tower falling... You'll see a couple collumns still standing above the blowing cloud of dust for a few seconds before they buckle in half and fall. Point proven. The collumns proved for themselves in plain sight they couldn't stand on their own.. So yea

  • @rsmithdrift "Without the floors the collums have no support structure at all" Wrong wrong wrong!!!! The central columns could stand on their own!!!

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more