AMD First DirectX 11 Movies, First DX11 Demos Part III

No description available.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• DirectX 11
• AMD
• DX11
• Demo

[R3STRIKT3D]

Yeah, Nvidia cards. LOL

Use too much power from the PSU, but still get outperformed by ATI. PhysX is a gimmick, and can be done on any graphics engine if the developer wants it.

;) Have a good day sir

[killerclown789]

Crysis 2 will be DX11 and we all know they will use it well.

[Wiliraughshai]

@R3STRIKT3D And that's why all benchmarks are Nvidia favoured eh? Just suck up your jelly with those sucky ATI drivers and bow to superiority.

[mukkohaha]

@psychonaut25 i have AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 x2 CrossfireX '

just 1 of the GPU' cards cost twice the amount of what a Xbox360 cost, my CPU cost Twice the Xbox Price, even my PSU cost almost Twice a Xbox360, my Motherboard, cost twice the amount a Xbox cost, my Ram cost twice, my SDD ( solid state drive hard disc ) cost Twice the amount.

Since your talking that shit, its clear you have compared a cheap shitty PC to Xbox ^^ hahahahaha

[mukkohaha]

@psychonaut25 Why must you embarrass yourself on the internet ? the 5 year old hardware not only runs on DX10, but is doing so with a V-Sync 30 Fps. that means you cannot see more frames per second then 30 :D While doing so in WAY worse Graphics.

do you want to know what kinda Anti-Aliasing X-box is doing ? 1x / 2x MSAA ( multi sample anti aliasing ) while i run my games in DX11 120 FPS 16 x SSAA Super sample AA, on 120 HZ monitor.

[killerclown789]

@psychonaut25 They will be pushing the PC version way further. The console version is dumbed down.

[psychonaut25]

@killerclown789 Hmm..It runs also on Xbox...an 5 year old hardware....so, who cares about DX11 ??

[dbzball]

@R3STRIKT3D although nvidia id outperformed, they still arent shit, and the physX just makes it easier for developers, although they could do it themselves, it just takes more time. but i agree with you, ATI FTW!

[wasad20]

Recorded on Cell Phone?

[mrb1untman]

@zomgbbqwth Heat depends on the cooling capability of the heatsink, the TDP of the card, and how well the case or card are pushing out that heat. It has nothing to do with how loaded or bottlenecked a low end GPU is. What you stated is a misconception of the uninformed.

Typically, higher end GPUs run hotter. The GTX 480, for example, heats up to 90-93C under load.

[keyzin]

ATI => good cheap powerful....Crossfire mode undefeated-able

nvidia = good quality , build for $ best on laptops than on pc like the ATI

downside = stupid SLI that only compatible with similar cards unlike crossfire

AMD = good powerful require good ventilating system in order to outperform intel

intel = i5 i7 multi core , without require huge amount of ventilation runs powerful multi-tasking with multi-threading capabilities ....

me= LOL

you guys = powerful