PGR 101 (Post Glacial Rebound)(Isostasy) - 3 - Larry King
Loading...
10,142
Loading...
Video Responses
This video is a response to 1983 US Festival T Shirt give away Contest PGRE. Scientific stuff Transparent Metal, Iron!
Loading...
@TheKith88 All data applied to the scientific study of post glacial rebound is not entirely accurate. For example, previous data on ice melt was based on observation of a few easily observable glaciers & extrapolated to the over 200,000 glaciers worldwide. Univ of CO researchers recently report that more accurate data from GRACE satellite on worldwide glacier melting shows previous data overestimated ice melt by 30%. scholar.google.com "Post Glacial Rebound"
LightReuse 3 weeks ago
@LightReuse Why is he wrong?Just the data?i'm not talking about him here.Is what he is saying weather its his hard work or others,is the data true,is post glacial rebounding the truth?Just a yes or no answer please.
TheKith88 3 weeks ago
Yeh the PC Voice has a long way to go.
cosmicpreachers2 4 months ago
SUPER!
moningstone 4 months ago
Good video but please speak yourself, or ask a friend to do it.
The monotony and glitch in the computer's voice makes this video hardly enjoyable.
classicalmix 5 months ago in playlist earth science
"The USGS downgrades almost all earthquakes, to prevent meaningful statistics from being generated from their databases. They also exclude quakes whenever they can, but this is unlikely to happen in the New Madrid area as it is in the center of a populated land mass. Thus you will have magnitude 6 quakes that will be called a 5.2, magnitude 7 quakes called a 6.1, and when a magnitude 8 or greater quake occurs, it will be called a 6.9." ZetaTalk
ActontheActor 6 months ago
luv it/.........................
cosmicpreachers2 7 months ago