WTC7 - "That is the building that is going to go down next"

Clearly as all evidence shows, what people say the day of 9/11 proves everything. If someone says a falling body sound like an explosion, then it was really a stick of dynamite falling.

Likewise this video shows that the police, firefighters and the reporter must have been in on the conspiracy.

Ashleigh Banfield moments after the collapse of WTC 1&2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeGCusfqF8c

9/11 - Television -- Full Version (HQ) - (9/12) 6 min in.
http://www.youtube.com//watch?v=g5esqefQHeQ

---

NIST Releases Final WTC 7 Investigation Report - November 20, 2008
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/techbeat/tbx2008_1120_wtc7.htm

Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (NIST NCSTAR 1A)
http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201A.pdf

---
As some people have trouble understanding this video, I'll explain: Sarcasm.
The video was originally to prove that the engineers on the ground advising the fire department could see the damage to the building and suggested that most likely the building was going to come down. The reporters simply got this information by talking to various officials (police/fire fighters) as word spread about it.

Yet, ironically some conspiracy theorists have managed to take this video, (and not the source provided) as even more proof that the reporters were in on it, as part of their videos. How the reporters *needed* to know in advance is beyond me. I guess in case the building fell and they didn't notice? Thank god the CTs gave them a heads up. I know whenever I'm planning a secret operation, the first thing I do is call CNN and tell them everything. (That's more sarcasm for the intellectually impaired)

It was also to make fun of the silly conspiracy videos that merely show various people saying the word explosion/explosive repeatedly the day of the event as if that's meaningful. I could easily make a video of people stating they saw various planes hitting the towers, from the tiny Cessna to a military Airbus. Selective editing is not proof of anything.

NIST was tasked with trying to determine the cause of the collapse. They stated what they found to be the most *probable* cause. They have never said it was THE DEFINITIVE ACTUAL cause. CTs have trouble understanding this difference and insist that NIST is in on it. NIST used their findings to make suggestions for how new buildings should be designed.

Many non-government agencies helped them as well. It's unlikely that such a large number of people would spend years creating a false story and being able to lie about it continuously just because the government asked them to. This is not human nature.


Besides, the real reason the government flew those planes into the building was to cover up the fact that a zombie virus was released and they had to eliminate it before it spread across the world destroying everything. We obviously didn't need a reason to go to war. When have we ever. Just ask Bush Sr. about that.

---
I usually delete posts and/or block anyone that:
-type in all CAPS, as they never have anything to say of intelligence/usefulness. (E.g., INSIDE JOB. WAKE UP!!!)
-Excessive rudeness
-Irrelevant Ads (E.g., Vote for Ron Paul!)
-Sometimes people asking me to explain the reasons/motivations behind what other people or organizations say or do. I'm not them! Stop asking me and expecting me to know.
-And anyone that's just plain annoying

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• wtc7
• 7 world trade
• World Trade Center
• Conspiracy
• terrorism
• September 11
• 2001
• 911
• 9/11
• Inside Job
• Ashleigh Banfield
• NIST
• FEMA
• nuts
• morons
• Cheney
• Bush
• usa

[Spindry96]

Firefighters heard creaking coming from the building hours before it fell and observed one area on one side bowing out. They knew it was structurally unsound and pulled back.

[PoetryHound]

Cool video. So WTC 7 was widely expected to collapse. So much for the top secret black ops demolition theory.

[igykalen]

@mrniceguy7113 You're a structural engineer?

28 support columns?

[mrniceguy7113]

@igykalen ALSO...if you look at the plans (i'm an engineer) the 28 support columns are even spaced. They do not have an "outer perimeter" and "core" structure like the Twin Towers. All 28 had to be cut simultaneously. AND the CIA/SS/FBI/NYOEM were in it.  I think that's where Guliani ran the whole thing. Guliani immediately called for all the personal video to be sent in. Rahm Emanuel is now running Chicago...I would be worried. (his father started MOSSAD)

[mrniceguy7113]

@igykalen No, the whole thing comes straight down. the roofline falls AT FREEFALL for about 8 stories. Not "nearly freefall" like the WTC1&2 which fell at 0.9G...but it fall at 1G. That means there is NOTHING UNDER IT. (not even pancaking floors) as the columns were taken out by a demo team. They blew all 28 columns at once. If one column failed (normally buildings are built with redundancy and factors of safety) the whole thing would not come straight down.

[igykalen]

@Sandberg1972 Observed characteristics?

You can't even think for yourself? You just want me to copy and paste come CT website you read?

911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analy­sis/collapses

"The cores were obliterated. There is no gravity collapse scenario that can account for the complete leveling of the massive columns of the towers' cores."

No references to back that up of course. Just say it's impossible. Truly scientific.

[igykalen]

@Sandber First, name any other high rise that has fallen down? What? you can't?

Then explain how it landed straight down ... WHEN a large portion of it ended up across the street ... In exactly the direction it was leaning before it fell?

You know nothing of this, but what CT videos tell you.

You want me to "Provide evidence that no credible engineers are saying it's false" HAHA. NO credible engineers? Why would I prove that None are saying it's false? You don't even know English.

[igykalen]

@mrniceguy7113 I thought they only referred to the outer columns on the northeast side you can see as falling for "freefall" for about 2 seconds, and clearly said that the interior was collapsing earlier. Correct me if I'm wrong.

[Sandberg1972]

@igykalen Any time a highrise falls straight down into itself we can safely assume that some kind of CD has taken place. This has always been the case and will always be the case.

The characteristics are easy to observe, maybe u can name them for me. Probably not I guess. Too much trouble right, plus u would get urself in all sorts of trouble identifying those characteristics.

Provide evidence that no credible engineers are saying it's false

U just go rambling around some more, I'm off.

[mrniceguy7113]

@ctcole77 NIST had to admit "Freefall" which means all 28 columns had to fail simultaneously...its as if they suddenly were not there. (I'm an engineer...goto AE911Truth(dot)org). NIST also refuses to release their "models" for their "simulation" (it was actually an "animation") for they say..."public safety". The ASCE article only "hypothesizes" initial collapse and does not pretend to explain total collapse. Just a few well placed "junk science" articles to control public opinion