WTC7 - "That is the building that is going to go down next"

Clearly as all evidence shows, what people say the day of 9/11 proves everything. If someone says a falling body sound like an explosion, then it was really a stick of dynamite falling.

Likewise this video shows that the police, firefighters and the reporter must have been in on the conspiracy.

Ashleigh Banfield moments after the collapse of WTC 1&2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeGCusfqF8c

9/11 - Television -- Full Version (HQ) - (9/12) 6 min in.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5esqefQHeQ

---

NIST Releases Final WTC 7 Investigation Report - November 20, 2008
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/techbeat/tbx2008_1120_wtc7.htm

Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (NIST NCSTAR 1A)
http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201A.pdf

---
As some people have trouble understanding this video, I'll explain: Sarcasm.
The video was originally to prove that the engineers AND firefighters on the ground were advising the fire department, could see the damage to the building and suggested that most likely the building was going to come down.
(YES they did notice the building leaning in a southerly direction and drew the conclusion that it might collapse.)
The reporters simply got this information by talking to various officials (police/fire fighters) as word spread about it. To pick apart the individual words they said in any clip as proof of anything is just plain dumb.

Yet, ironically some conspiracy theorists have managed to take this video, (and not the source provided) as even more proof that the reporters were in on it, as part of their videos. How the reporters *needed* to know in advance is beyond me. I guess in case the building fell and they didn't notice? Thank god the CTs gave them a heads up. I know whenever I'm planning a secret operation, the first thing I do is call CNN and tell them everything. (That's more sarcasm for the intellectually impaired)

It was also to make fun of the silly conspiracy videos that merely show various people saying the word explosion/explosive repeatedly the day of the event as if that's meaningful. I could easily make a video of people stating they saw various planes hitting the towers, from the tiny Cessna to a military Airbus. Selective editing is not proof of anything.

NIST was tasked with trying to determine the cause of the collapse. They stated what they found to be the most *probable* cause. They have never said it was THE DEFINITIVE ACTUAL cause. CTs have trouble understanding this difference and insist that NIST is in on it. NIST used their findings to make suggestions for how new buildings should be designed.

Many non-government agencies helped them as well. It's unlikely that such a large number of people would spend years creating a false story and being able to lie about it continuously just because the government asked them to. This is not human nature.


Besides, the real reason the government flew those planes into the building was to cover up the fact that a zombie virus was released and they had to eliminate it before it spread across the world destroying everything. We obviously didn't need a reason to go to war. When have we ever? Just ask Bush Sr. about that.

---
I usually delete posts and/or block anyone that:
-Types in all CAPS, as they never have anything to say of intelligence/usefulness. (E.g., INSIDE JOB. WAKE UP!!!)
-Excessive rudeness (I really don't care whose side you're on)
-Irrelevant Ads (E.g., Vote for Ron Paul 2016! He MIGHT still be alive!)
-/Sometimes/ people asking me to explain the reasons/motivations behind what other people or organizations say or do. I'M NOT THEM! Stop asking me and expecting me to know.
-And anyone that's just plain annoying.

Youtube also only notifies me of one comment at a time, so I don't see ALL new comments until I see the page; hence the need for approval. I can't respond if I don't see it. I also have other things to do. So if it takes days for me to check back here... you'll just have to deal with it, okay? :)

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• wtc7
• 7 world trade
• World Trade Center
• Conspiracy
• terrorism
• September 11
• 2001
• 911
• 9/11
• Inside Job
• Ashleigh Banfield
• NIST
• FEMA
• nuts
• morons
• Cheney
• Bush
• usa

[mrniceguy7113]

@igykalen No, the whole thing comes straight down. the roofline falls AT FREEFALL for about 8 stories. Not "nearly freefall" like the WTC1&2 which fell at 0.9G...but it fall at 1G. That means there is NOTHING UNDER IT. (not even pancaking floors) as the columns were taken out by a demo team. They blew all 28 columns at once. If one column failed (normally buildings are built with redundancy and factors of safety) the whole thing would not come straight down.

[Sandberg1972]

@igykalen Any time a highrise falls straight down into itself we can safely assume that some kind of CD has taken place. This has always been the case and will always be the case.

The characteristics are easy to observe, maybe u can name them for me. Probably not I guess. Too much trouble right, plus u would get urself in all sorts of trouble identifying those characteristics.

Provide evidence that no credible engineers are saying it's false

U just go rambling around some more, I'm off.

[igykalen]

@Sandb Has Banfield talked about her experience with WTC7? Yes. Look it up.

Have other people been interviewed about it? About her experience, or just the millions that inhabit New York City?

I don't know what you're talking about with Klaus. No reference. Provide a link at the very least. Even if I saw a video, why would I know why they are cheering. Your question sounds abstract and has nothing to do with the physics of a building.

wtcdemolitions's account has been terminated.

[Sandberg1972]

@igykalen Has Banfield talked about her experience with WTC7?

Have other people been interviewed about it?

What about the guy who filmed the Klaus Laubmeyer footage? How did he know where to look for? Why are people cheering in that video?

U really should look at the synchronized video of Banfield interviewing that woman with her child & footage of WTC7 from the air and other collapsefootage.

I believe wtcdemolitions has that video.

[igykalen]

@Sandberg1972 You think the penthouse caused that much dust by the time she looked? Did you even look at the original video? What about the hundreds of other people there that saw the same thing? Where are all of their reports of shock waves being felt? When does she ever mention it even?

[Sandberg1972]

@igykalen No my friend.

When Ashleigh whipped her neck around to look over to B7 the collapse of the ROOFLINE had NOT started yet. What HAD started indeed was the 1st sequence of the demolition, that being the sinking of the mechanical penthouse through the roof. Very strange thing this "vertical upward progression of failure" as NIST liked to call it.

Yes a-ma-zing, how it was just sitting there, then suddenly dropping dead, going into freefall for over 2 seconds, absolutely amazing.

[igykalen]

@Sandberg1972 Her name is Ashleigh and that would have had to be the slowest shock wave ever as the building had already begun to collapse when she saw the debris and heard everyone's voice getting louder over it as they are looking at it.

If you rather just make up theories to your liking, fine, but the Higher Quality video link to the original unedited footage shows this clearly.

[Sandberg1972]

@PoetryHound Yeah, apparently some mystery engineer who's name is unknown told the Fire Chiefs WTC7 was in danger of (total?) collapse (even though that NEVER EVER happened before). This then was passed along to every firemen and some reporters, like Ashley Banfield.

Seems like Ashley was a bit surprised and scared when she saw WTC7 completely implode in 7 seconds, right after she apparently felt some shockwave, which is why she suddely whipped her head around while WTC7 was still standing.

[Spindry96]

Firefighters heard creaking coming from the building hours before it fell and observed one area on one side bowing out. They knew it was structurally unsound and pulled back.

[PoetryHound]

Cool video. So WTC 7 was widely expected to collapse. So much for the top secret black ops demolition theory.

[igykalen]

@mrniceguy7113 You're a structural engineer?

28 support columns?

[mrniceguy7113]

@igykalen ALSO...if you look at the plans (i'm an engineer) the 28 support columns are even spaced. They do not have an "outer perimeter" and "core" structure like the Twin Towers.  All 28 had to be cut simultaneously. AND the CIA/SS/FBI/NYOEM were in it. I think that's where Guliani ran the whole thing. Guliani immediately called for all the personal video to be sent in. Rahm Emanuel is now running Chicago...I would be worried. (his father started MOSSAD)