Executive compensation at public companies is a hot topic. The amount that top executives make may seem too much -- or is it? Tom Noe, professor of business at Tulane University, discusses current research on the subject, covering prevailing theories, how they can be applied and whether there is an answer to that question.
The best place to start in understanding the huge moral hazard built into corporate governance remains the classic "Modern Corporation and Private Property" by Berle & Means.
That same moral hazard also played a huge role in the bubble with the preposterous efficient market hypothesis and buy & hold nonsense peddled by fund managers who take incentive fees when funds go up but suffer no losses when they fall.
Heads I win; tails you lose. It is a thieving racket clothed in respectability.
ssatrofma 2 years ago
What he fails to mention is that the consequences of any _bad_ decisions of the CEO are also magnified. When a worker makes a mistake in screwing in the bolt, he causes a loss of $1. When the CEO runs the company into the ground due to bad decisions or sheer incompetence, the loss he causes is equally magnified.
The worker gets fired. The CEO bails out with a golden parachute.
This theory is all BS.
ssatrofma 2 years ago
@5:33 thanks!!!!.....(i hate commercials)
TheBrightBlackPearl 2 years ago
If you want to skip all the intro stuff, the lecture actually starts at 5:33.
RonDeKiller 2 years ago