Night Vision UFOs & Infrared Lasers Jan 2012.wmv

Part of a session, last week when finally cloud parted to enable a visible sky.
Video capture with Yukon Ranger 5 x 42 night vision monocular, illumination with 5 watt and 3 watt infrared lasers. Lasers range is 3 km and beam spread around 30 meters at tip for 5,000 mW unit.
Audio tracks are listed in ending credits and all are creative commons licensed, available at Jamendo.com - No copyright breach of any audio tracks......
This video is copyright to orgasmictomato productions and may be re-posted in full without alteration under the conditions of standard Youtube video. It may not be edited in any way before usage. This video may be downloaded and used in a educational manner as long as kept in original form.

Stills showing Dimensional Entities can be viewed at my Flickr pages, RealUFOs.ning.com , and photobucket sites. Search orgasmictomato




http://www.flickr.com/photos/orgasmictomato/

http://realufos.ning.com/profile/orgasmictomato

http://s929.photobucket.com/albums/ad136/orgasmictomato/Favourite%20Dimension...

Added Jan 21:-
For any interest in facts..... a recent answer to a commenter on Flickr re possibility of some being a "cloud" being videoed moving through the laser.......

At only one frame captured in passing through the laser beam at 30 meters wide, then it can be calculated that the speed would be a minimum of 432 km/hr
for that object...... @frame rate of 30fps Interpolated capture results in a actual frame rate of some 3.9fps..... so using 4 for ease then the laser beam width at 30 meters wide would give us a single frame in 120 meters per second.... which equates to 432 kilometrs per hour minimum.......... or there would be more captures per passing or more frames to each capture...... some of which do show as slow moving and more frame captures..... but the question was in regard to one particular photo and capture....
I hope you find this information useful, thanks.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Unidentified Flying Object
• Infrared
• Night Vision
• Night
• Space
• UFO Sighting
• UFO
• UFO Sightings 2012
• Lasers
• Infrared Lasers
• Laser illumination
• Science
• Research
• Australia
• UFO Australia
• Phenomena
• Sky
• Night Sky
• Dimensional
• Dimensional Entities
• FRJS Research Australia
• Australian Research
• Earth
• Moon
• Universe
• Quantum Mechanics
• Quantum Field Theory
• Plasma
• Electromagnetic Plasma
• Electromagnetic
• Magnetosphere
• Solar Wind
• Radiation
• Infrared Dimension

[james3244]

Let people rate your videos, so it will attract more viewers. People will like your work because it is legit. No question.

[orgasmictomato]

@james3244 I am not after ratings and you obviously have not been around on Youtube too long to realise there are many morons here that spend there time just debunking and trying to discredit videos for a pastime, believe me, they even make multiple channels so they can rate down your posts and laugh it all off. If people like you like my information then a comment as you have done is appropriately received and appreciated, thanks.(with control to edit the ignorant, brain-dead)

Jim

[geeksquad1001]

WOW Amazing Stuff!!!!!!

THUMBS UP RATING! ;D

[CurtisSalopek]

Great footage. This is some amazing stuff.

[sumstuff46]

The sky is an ORB FACTORY, i see 1000's of them in that beam and the smart dust, it is horrible breathing in that smart dust, this is such a revealing video gotta get this one out for everyone to see

[orgasmictomato]

@z0fty /2 None are kilometers wide and none are proven to be of organic/cells structure. Sorry but it is important to stay with actual known FACTS, here not speculation. Yes they may be associated... but unproven as yet. NASA tapes are NOT videoed in infrared, there cameras are taping visible light with maybe a slightly broader UV and IR inclusion than 400nm - 700nm wavelength, but no attribution to Martyn Stubbs. etc. This is results of 3 years of my work & research. No-one does this

[orgasmictomato]

@z0fty I appreciate the comment, but fail to see why you try to give credit to others for my discovery and work. If you associate my sightings and captures with objects of vast size as the NASA "donuts", then that deteriorates my work to another and suggests that the subjects have already been identified, that is incorrect. The objects that pass through the laser beam can be calculated for size and speed by utilising maths for the range and frame captures with the beam width. None are kmW

[MrObetron]

Well Done. Great footage.

[gtrfrost]

You can tell that the beam is quite wide at the end. Thanks for you explanation. Great Work

[orgasmictomato]

@gtrfrost 3/ so you see my technique here is totally different to SOT. there are many smaller particles floating in the wind.. the laser at 3km does not illuminate these for the IR camera and at 30 meters width of the beam at the tip any insect would be basically unobservable. The objects you are witness to are mostly greater than a half meter in size with many of 3 - 4 meters and larger. So lets see the "know it all's" explain those as leaves, cotton, birds, bats or the like.

Jim

[orgasmictomato]

@gtrfrost 2/ also the fact that my method captures objects that are at 2 - 3 km altitude, not at roof top level. The fact that my lasers are allowing actual scaling of the objects to a degree also eliminates smaller particles as claimed by skeptics of SOT, after all most skeptics don't have a advanced brain here. My motorised equatorial mount you suggest does not travel at speeds to allow following the sun, the cameras used with N8 filters still allow visible light into the camera, etc

[orgasmictomato]

@gtrfrost yes that is solar obliteration technique and captures unseen particles in the atmosphere, but does not allow the individual capture of fast moving units that are not insects etc. and can be observed in infrared light only. That is to say where I do IR illumination, the subject is seen by illumination by IR light from the laser with little to none interference from visible light, whereas the daylight interferes with results. My computer program is to process night images only

[gtrfrost]

@orgasmictomato I saw a you tube clip where this guy used the same camera stepup (i think) but he did it in daylight and used a street lamp to block the sun it had the same effect but you could see more.. Got me thinking you could mount the camera to one of those electric telescope things that track the stars but track the sun instead and also mout something to block out the direct sun. The you could run it for a full day.. that would be cool..

[orgasmictomato]

@gtrfrost thought people were getting bored with them.......... I take a lot of video for study, but post a small sample only......... don't seem to get much reaction to the videos and when people get that complacent about new discoveries that could change the world ...!!! thanks for the interest and comment....

@orange70383 and one day you are going to have your camera ready and capture one for yourself....... yes? ...... How is the job situation going?

[gtrfrost]

More Lasers Please!

[orange70383]

@orange70383 I forgot to say - the plasma ball was roughly 3-feet in diameter, was primarily light green in color turning to yellow around it's outer edge and the trailing distinctly gold colored sparks for 6-9 feet behind it.

[orange70383]

You have some of the highest quality documentation I've seen. Quite amazing. Back in August on a clear night I was talking my dog on our nightly walk/sky-watch, I got a bit of a start. Out of the silent sky a fairly bright green luminous plasma ball? appeared. The ball was only 150-200 meters away from me and approx. 50-feet up. It traveled parallel to the ground at 15 - 20 mph for 3 or 4 seconds then vanished. Wasn't a meteor, really astonishing. That makes my 3rd plasma? sighting in 10-years.