Fox News Cut Off Ron Paul When He Starts To Talk About Media Treatment After Last Debate

After the South Carolina debate on CNN, there was a media blackout of Ron Paul. Ron Paul brought this up on Fox News when being interviewed by Neil Cavuto...and was CUT OFF! Americans need to know the media doesn't want Ron Paul as President. But the Armed Forces and the Youth of today who get their news from the internet, NOT the Main Stream Media like Fox News, know what Ron Paul stands for. Limited government, PEACE, Liberty, less taxes and the only Candidate for President with a real plan to cut spending.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• South Carolina Primary
• Evangelicals
• Ron Paul
• Fox News
• Neal Cavuto
• 2012 Presidential Campaign
• vote 2012

[PaulChildres]

Anyone who finds this video unfair and a slap in the face to Ron Paul supporters, please sign this petition to STOP the media blackout of Ron Paul/ We need about 3500 more signatures so get on it people!

Go to change.org and then search for Ron Paul blackout.

[hcube]

how ironic and (convenient) that they cut him off right during that question. Ron Paul deserve tremendous respect for putting up with these shameful MSM.

[Mattywright191]

The mainstream medias antics will only hurt them in the long run.

[iam1inamil]

....another thing.......having ron paul as a common denominator......has a very nice feeling of ....hope???.......his ideals sink into the soul and feel so wholesome.........he is very, [whats the word???]

[iam1inamil]

@iam1inamil .....a few replys to my idea would be nice,for objective critic.....anyone???

[iam1inamil]

.....i think all ron paul supporters need to buy....[me included] a dvd burner ,,,,and start handing dvds out to the [parrots] who regurgitate the catch phrases like unelectable or too old or????....we all know these phrases come from non open minded,non informed sheeple who are very gullible....all it takes to change the hearts and soul of these "types"...is an easy to watch and informative video they can pop into their tv and discuss the logic with others after the viewing

[fountainherz]

@MrBartSampson

Comparison of TREATMENT != comparison of say, INFORMATION. And since you want to continue being an aspie retard, I compared _treatment_ by THREE news stations, not just "two." If you're going to be a nitpicking retard, at least get it right You've repeated your sub-par reading skills on more than one occasion.

P.S. Check my OTHER reply, which I apparently have to inform you of because of your obliviousness as shown in my other reply.

[fountainherz]

@MrBartSampson

Oh dear god, "the first part was never written anywhere."

Either

1) Look at the bottom of this page (or page 2 depending on when comments go through) and look for my username.

or

2) "See all comments" and CTRLF my name.

_I brought up what I wrote a WEEK ago_

It's -right fucking there-. LOL. DIRECTLY above the comment you INITIALLY replied to.

[MrBartSampson]

@fountainherz How am I demonstrating my "sub-par" reading skills when the things you are writing now weren't originally there for me to read? The whole first part "ideas are pretty much opposed" blah blah, was never written anywhere. You're simply writing it now and acting as though I've been ignoring it the whole time. And no, comparing two news stations is like comparing heroin to methadone: it's basically the same shit and none of it is good for you. SO AGAIN, get'cha head out.

[fountainherz]

@MrBartSampson

Thanks for confirming your sub-par reading comprehension.

"I don't even know where you think you wrote that."

>"ideas are pretty much opposed by BOTH sides of congress, which has more power than the executive branch."

"You simply boiled this down to a...contest between CNN MSNBC hence lesser of two evils"

>"I've seen CNN...treat him better than how Faux does."

Because observing a news station's treatments and comparing to others, is advocation.

You're retarded.

[MrBartSampson]

@fountainherz Apparently you have a tough time gauging the meaning of responses. A very easy time reading to deeply into them, and in turn ironically applying your short-comings to others. At no point in your comment did you allude to anyone being able to get anything done, at all. I don't even know where you think you wrote that. You simply boiled this video down to a pissing contest between CNN, MSNBC, and FOX. Hence the "lesser of two evils" remark. So again, get your head out, son ;)