DNA and Computers

DNA and Computers. Randall Niles dives into the Digital Code inherent in all living things. (This is a 2007 low res classic - For higher quality, please visit "DNA Structure" on this same YouTube channel.)

The DNA molecule is one of the greatest scientific discoveries of all time. First described by James Watson and Francis Crick in 1953, DNA is the famous storehouse of genetics that establishes each organism's physical characteristics.

DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) is a double-stranded molecule that is twisted into a helix structure (similar to a spiral staircase). The DNA molecule is comprised of chemical bases arranged in approximately 3 billion precise sequences. Even the DNA molecule for the single-celled bacterium, E. coli, contains enough information to fill an entire set of Encyclopedia Britannica.

The four bases that make up the stairs in the spiraling staircase are adenine (A), thymine (T), cytosine (C), and guanine (G). These stairs act as the "letters" in the genetic alphabet, producing detailed instructions for the formation and functioning of the host cell.

The A, T, C and G in the genetic code of the DNA molecule can be compared to the "0" and "1" in the binary code of computer software. Like software to a computer, DNA is a genetic language that communicates information to organic matter.

Although DNA code is remarkably complex, the information translation system that interprets DNA is what really baffles science! Like any language, letters and words mean nothing outside the shared convention that gives those letters and words meaning.

Indeed, the DNA molecule is an intricate, microscopic, digital message system with its own inherent language convention! Far more advanced than any software system, DNA is a self-correcting, self duplicating, information storage and retrieval system that can develop a living organism from raw biological material!

J.D. Watson and F.H.C. Crick, Structure of Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid, Nature, 171:737 (1953).

***

Visit http://www.allaboutthejourney.org/dna-molecule.htm to understand how DNA and computers reveal one of the greatest scientific discoveries of all time.

Also, go to http://www.RandallNiles.com/videos.htm to watch more videos about DNA, Computers, and other evidence of Design in Nature!

Category:

Education

Tags:

• DNA Molecule
• DNA
• Computers
• Computer Code
• Double Spiral Helix
• Digital Code
• Binary Code
• Complexity of life
• Randall Niles
• You Tube Video

[buffboynick]

@lethalsub

Some say Gravity comes from gravitons emitted from the 4th/5th dimension.

Some say Gravity comes from gravitons emitted from stars.

Some say Gravity comes strictly from objects of great mass.

Even PHD Physicists debate this!!! There is empirical evidence gravity exists, but NOT empirical data showing WHERE it comes from.

[buffboynick]

@lethalsub

No you didnt.

The deepest depth drilled into the Crust was the Soviet Kola Superborehole Project which ONLY drilled 7.6 Miles down__FACT.

Also, seismic readings show the Earth vibrates like a Bell.

Plus the satellite images of the pole have holes in them (rather funny NASA can see galaxies light years away but cant produce a clear image of the Poles). No empirical data in Inner Earth exists. Also, in HET....the crust is 800 miles thick, not 100% hollow.

Tsky, Mc Tsk Tsk tard!

[lethalsub]

@buffboynick "Btw, where Gravity comes from hasnt even been "empirically proven" yet." Provide me with a source retard.

Just to skull fuck you even further with the scientific method that you should know about.

[lethalsub]

@buffboynick "I have empirical evidence you're a tard, and I accumulated MUCH MORE than 17 minutes of data on it." Come on then fraud, where is it?

"If Alex Collier told you that he had 17 minutes of data confirming the Earth is Hollow than would you believe that." If Collier the retard told me that the current british monarch was Queen Elizabeth II, I wouldn't believe him.

[lethalsub]

@buffboynick "Provide empirical evidence. (this should be interesting, since none exists)" Well, I provided some for you, why didn't you notice it before retard?

[lethalsub]

@buffboynick "But until its studied for longer than 17 minutes, its remains "hypothetical" Who decides this retard?

[lethalsub]

@buffboynick "Its clear you have no point in this discussion since you're trying to convince me "antimatter" exists when I already know it does (thanks to Alex Collier)" No, same point I made before, DON"T LIE ABOUT YOUR CREDENTIALS.

[buffboynick]

@lethalsub

Your circular reasoning fails again.

Its clear you have no point in this discussion since you're trying to convince me "antimatter" exists when I already know it does (thanks to Alex Collier)

Tell us all why you believe in Core, Mantle, Crust Theory?

Provide empirical evidence. (this should be interesting, since none exists)

[buffboynick]

@lethalsub

I have empirical evidence you're a tard, and I accumulated MUCH MORE than 17 minutes of data on it.

If Alex Collier told you that he had 17 minutes of data confirming the Earth is Hollow than would you believe that.

Btw...I already know antimatter exists (Collier stated it in a lecture in the 90's, before CERN)

However, if you had a functioning brain, you'd want more than 17 mins of data on something before you say its not hypothetical

Dark matter/dark energy = also hypothetical

[DisprovingEvolution]

@lethalsub

It appears that BBN has PWNED you with his physics understanding. Tsk, tsk