JFK Assassination part 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
75,283
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 28, 2009

This video provides an indepth analysis of the JFK assassination and particularly, the attack in Dealey Plaza. Much of this may contradict what you have been told over the years, from people on both sides of the conspiracy debate.

I only ask that you look at this objectively, and analytically, and at least temporarily, set aside your preconceptions.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 12 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (bobharris77)

  • quick question... if he was using a noise suppressor, how is it that they heard the shot with all the noise?

  • @buttonupshirt I don't know which shot you are referring to. The shots at 285 and after, were not fired from a suppressed weapon. The shot at 160 was heard by some because it shattered when it hit the pavement, generating "sparks" and sounded like a firecracker although it was not loud enough to provoke startle reactions as did the shots at 285 and 312.

    Many witnesses like Clint Hill, Charles Brehm, Mary Moorman and others, didn't hear it at all.

  • they saboed your vid bob , it's stops playin bout 1:43

  • @donewithitall1 Hmm... I checked it just now and it ran fine. Do you have the latest flash player?

  • So If Aswalled used a silencer then he shot twice, missed, screwed It off and just shot without the silincer right?

  • @Grimreaper905 Oswald didn't use a silencer.

Top Comments

  • Think about this; the metal jacketed " Single or Magic Bullet" supposedly caused all those wounds to Kennedy and Connally, and was found in excellent shape, yet the same jacketed bullet exploded Kennedy's head and fragmented into many small pieces. Just doesn't figure to me.

see all

All Comments (86)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • THe only thing I want to know is : WHO KILL JFK ans WHY ? I dont care about number of shots. WHO kill this man and WHY Y

    Thank.

  • @Cosmosity My point is that you are making some assumptions based on poor-quality video and rather wild supposition. Further, I have no idea as to whether or not JFK heard a 130dB gunshot (gunshots AND firecrackers both come in on average at around 140dB, incidentally). But, more importantly, neither do you or anyone else know if he heard a 130dB gunshot. The only one who knows if he heard it was him, and he can't tell us. When *assumptions* are presented as evidence, it ruins credibility.

  • @Cosmosity Oh, and btw, this is bobharris77  on my alternate account.

  • @UileagPPRG Uh huh - so he just heard a 130 decibel gunshot and that made him grin ear to ear???

    Look again at the position of his right hand shielding his face as he twisted to his right. That had to have been the most convoluted "wave" JFK ever made in his life:-)

  • "I don't we're seeing a grimace rather than a smile." I doubt it entirely. "...is clearly shielding his face with his right hand." Or... he's waving with his hand to the people who are cheering and waving at him. "We seem to have seen two distinct reactions by President Kennedy." No we haven't. We've seen a guy waving at people who are cheering loudly and waving to him. Unless, of course, you WANT to see something different in a grainy, COMPLETELY undiscernable video (like this one). Sad.

  • possible shileding by hand from the sun??...interesting that the motocop does not look right or move at at all, excpet everybody elses??? strange or cop may have been deaf?

  • BAAM!!! NOT EPIC FAIL!

  • why would he shield his face with his hand? im sure he wasnt that stupid to think that would save him

  • You make too many leaps of assumption here.

    1. Your analysis of JFK's 'reactions' is very poor. He is just waving.

    2. Suggesting he is reacting to a missed shot with a suppressed (silent) rifle requires absolutely no proof, and is a leap too far in your imagination.

    Unfortunately, this kind of shoddy analysis only serves to detract even further from the facts of what happened, Please stick to what can be proved, not what you assume.

  • So you just ignore the witnesses seeing and hearing the shots from the TSBD building? No one heard shots from the Daltex building

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more