Irrefutable Proof for Moon Landing - Lunar Gravity

Lunar gravity as determined from official NASA Apollo footage provides irrefutable proof for being filmed on the moon. In addition to the Apollo 14 SEQ Bay Pendulum the Apollo 16 Flying Bag is analyzed to provide g = 1.54 and 1.57 m/s^2 in agreement with lunar gravity (g = 1.62 m/s^2) and distinct from earth gravity (g = 9.81 m/s^2). Therefore, both, pendulum and free fall motion confirm lunar gravity within a 5 % error margin. Moon landing conspiracy theorists have accused NASA to simulate lunar gravity by using wires and decreasing playback speed, but failed to recognize that there is only ONE physically correct playback speed for such an operation: 41 % (SQRT (1/6)) - as seen by using the equation » P = 2pi * SQRT (L / g) « for the pendulum or » t = SQRT (2y / g) « for free fall.

Consequently, it should be possible to restore the alleged original 1g conditions by increasing the playback speed to 246 % (SQRT 6). Under these conditions objects move as if accelerated by earth gravity (g = 9.81 m/s^2) but movements of the astronauts become incredibly fast, showing the impossibility to simulate lunar gravity by slowing down footage recorded on earth.

All NASA footage obtained from public domain, AS14 SEQ Bay Pendulum cropped, AS16 Flying Bag animation with timer reproduced at 80% playback speed. All other footage reproduced at 100% (for lunar gravity) or 246% (for earth gravity) playback speed.

Music: Ghostwriter by RJ2D

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Apollo
• moon
• NASA
• hoax
• pendulum
• free
• fall
• proof
• gravity
• conspiracy
• playback
• speed

[inagod]

anybody who believes the moon landing's were a hoax,is missing a few brain cells,even the Japanese took scans and photographs of the Apollo sites,in one scan that JAX took of one of the landing sites,it matched perfectly with a photo of the same area taken by one of the Apollo astronauts taken at ground level.The Japanese said the only way that photograph could have been made was by someone standing on the moon.400,000 people worked on Apollo,amazing achievement

[LunarTuner]

@OpenTheTrollGate, a colony is exponentially more difficult, costly & dangerous, but possible. How will a colony prove that Apollo was real? How would you even be convinced that a colony is even there? Photos, video, rock samples, independent tracking, retroreflectors & massive rockets? Been there-done that.

[OpenTheTrollGate]

@LunarTuner a lunar colony would ber a good proof that we went there

[LunarTuner]

@OpenTheTrollGate, okay, apparently you won't answer my question for whatever reason.

I can only assume that if China, India, Japan or any country told you they landed on the moon, you would not accept any evidence. What it comes down to is not "proof," but what convinces you or persuades you. All I'm asking is what is sufficient for you. You don't seem willing to answer, so why are we having this discussion?

[OpenTheTrollGate]

@LunarTuner is there a proof proving god exists?

[LunarTuner]

@OpenTheTrollGate, I asked you a simple question...

If any agency from any country or any private company ever want to the moon--past, present or future--what would you consider proof that they actually did it?

Simple--what do you consider sufficient proof?

[OpenTheTrollGate]

@LunarTuner prove it, but I know you can't, since all arguments imply a set of assumptions that are even more difficult to prove.

[LunarTuner]

@OpenTheTrollGate, do you plan on just name-calling, or can you carry on a civil discussion? If you can't, we're done.

If I may ask a question: If any agency from any country or any private company ever want to the moon--past, present or future--what would you consider proof that they actually did it?

[OpenTheTrollGate]

@LunarTuner no one can prove that they went on the moon either.

[OpenTheTrollGate]

@LunarTuner LOL, I thought you were some idiot who responded to me in that video of a dude saying quantum mechanics was a religion.