Ron Paul on H1N1: Freedom of Choice for All Americans!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,051
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 28, 2009

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Keep calling them out, Dr. Paul! Thank you for being the voice of the Constitution and of common sense!

  • Ron you have my vote. God bless and protect you. Thank you for your service to our country.

see all

All Comments (44)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Also, I believe that the most important point here is that using gold or silver or at least SOMETHING of stable, and worldwide value is a FAR better system than this fiat currency that's backed by nothing more than 'legal tender'.

    However, if you want to continue believing that the BOC is doing you such a huge favor, then by all means just do that, and have a grand ole life k?

  • I've already pointed out that the BOC does precisely that, because they control how much money is in circulation and therefore, yes they do control how much inflation occurs.

    And in regards of there being enough gold to back all the real productive assets in the world, that is a subject I haven't studied, I merely repeated what I've heard from someone I hold to be more credible than a poster on YouTube.

  • that is incredibly incorrect. Prices fluctuate based on productivity, efficiency and the environment. Food would be much cheaper today than in Roman times since it is cheaper to make (better farming techniques, etc.), but labour intensive items would be more expensive since we no longer allow for slavery. Also the amount of gold has changed considerably in relation to economic output, there isnt enough gold to back all the real productive assets in the world.

  • Purchasing power is the value of the currency. No one determines some ephemeral value of a currency then sets prices. Prices reflect the value of paper money. If too much paper is floating around with too few goods to purchase, then inflation occurs. The reason living costs are higher in Alberta than Ontario for example is supply and demand, not the currency since both use the Canadian dollar. You are mixing up concepts and oversimplifying them.

  • Which is why up until very recently, all monies were backed by gold. And in that way, prices were MUCH more stable, than they are now.

    I've heard from someone I find to be very credible that an oz. of gold today will buy approximately the same amount of goods as it would've even back in Rome 2,000 years ago.

    How's that for stability, and what might that do for people's ability to plan financially?

  • The price to be paid for living is determined by how much the currency's worth. THEN supply and demand can play on each other in relation to cost of living. In other words, you have to know how much the currency is worth in order to figure out a reasonable price balance between merchant and consumer.

    The BOC dictates also how much money is in circulation for the country, as well as interest rates, and therefore they dictate how much the dollar's worth.

  • complacent towards what?

  • Wrong, cost of living is set by supply and demand. Sometimes inflation and deflation are the results of supply and demand, and monetary policy, but those are symptoms, not causes. The BOC sets interests rates mostly on par with the US central bank.

    There is no argument that Alberta's oil is its primary economic driver.

  • And Alberta not charging much in the way of taxation has allowed Albertans to become complacent for the most part. Most of the Albertans I've talked with when I lived there agree with that.

  • And, I'm not the one that's claiming that capitalism is when the federal gov't is providing social programs. Here's a clue for you SOCIALism, CAPITALism.  Get it?? And for further evidence of this, how many social programs did the US federal gov't provide prior to 1900, back when it was a much more true capitalism? Maybe where you're getting confused is the difference between Federal and Provincial, and Local?

    In regards of this so called slander, frankly, whom slandered whom first?

  • You're right, the gov't of Alberta doesn't regulate the cost of living, it's actually set by inflation/ deflation (or more accurately the devaluation or valuation of the currency), which is dictated by your very own BOC, which is beyond Alberta's provincial gov't, and even the federal gov't of Canada, in consideration of the golden rule.

    Alberta has gotten away with not charging very much taxation largely because of it's oil.

  • Cost of living and taxes are different issues. The gvrnt in Alberta doesnt regulate cost of living, the market sets it, so its not a hidden tax. If you want to argue if the lower taxes offset cost of living, thats a seperate debate. You cant change definitions to fit your argument when you are wrong. Alberta is probably the most insulated area from the economic disaster. Until oil is no longer needed, we will be fine, nobody is making any more oil, and supply is finite.

  • Way to slander an entire jurisdiction of people, the vast majority of whom you will never meet, and have no idea about. Perhaps my counter argument should be of equal intellectual caliber, lets say, "you are as ugly and dumb as all the folks in (insert appropriate location) name are."

  • For starters, Alberta pretends to have the lowest taxes in Canada, what you don't probably realize is that the prices of your standard of living more than makes up for that (ie the hidden tax).

    Secondly, now that the oil companies have given the Alberta's gov't the big f- you, I wouldn't expect this monthly premium to be removed forever.

    Beyond this, I'm done with your education until you pony up the cash.

  • Thank you, you've just proven yourself to be ignorant and wrong, typical of Alberta.

  • You have no idea what you are talking about. Socialism and Communism are when the government starts interfering with the economy. Government providing social programs from funds gathered by taxes is not socialism. Capitalism is an economic model, not a political model. You are describing libertarianism.

  • For starters, Canada's taxation isnt that terribly high. Secondly, inflation in Canada is no worse than the US, especially now since the US is printing money left right and centre, and destroying the dollar. Monthly premiums in Alberta have been removed, but when we had them, they were negligable, and subsidized for those who couldnt afford them. I think the best system would be a privately provided health care, paid by a public insurance program.

  • All you wah wah babies who want Ron Paul to run in 2012. You do not vote for a President, the Electors do and YOU ARE NOT AN ELECTOR so shut the fukc up about it.

  • I love you Ron Paul... THANK YOU for reminding us that there are still rational, constitution-abiding citizens in this country that understand. But you do more than understand.. you are a fighter... you are a leader... and you are the closest thing that America has to the forefathers who founded this country. I contributed to, and worked with a grass-roots chapter of your presidential campaign. In my heart, and in my own American spirit, and in my private logic... YOU ARE MY PRESIDENT. *kiss

  • I wish Ron Paul was running against Obama just so I could see the two debate and decide who is the best choice. Obama was better than McCain,but I get the feeling Ron Paul would have been pretty darn sweet too. I'd like to compare the two and see who would be best president. I hope Ron paul runs in 2012

  • Of course the usage of this medical care probably rises dramatically when people are doing as they now are doing and going to see the doctor over every little sniffle and sneaze. I think it's very humerous that people are actually wearing surgical masks in the waiting rooms of clinics now!

  • A little correction there on ideologies. as what you've described as capitalism is actually socialism which is a slippery slope towards communism which is what our N. American gov'ts are busy setting themselves up for.

    Capitalism is where social programs are run by society (ie local communities, cities, or states) ONLY, and the Federal Gov'ts role is simply to provide military for protection, judicial authorities, and lawmakers.

  • It's not factually incorrect, when you consider the very high taxation, and understand that inflation is also a hidden tax, and put that together with monthly premiums vs. actual usage.

    And I totally disagree that the Gov't provides efficient care. What they provide is a cap for the pay of all medical personnel, mandating longer hours, as well as the care they provide.

  • Bless Ron Paul !! 5/5

  • KEEP SPEAKING THE TRUTH DR. PAUL! (and PLEEEEEASE run for president again in 2012!)

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more