YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Vérinage Compilation - Explosiveless Demolition

TheInsaneBolt TheInsaneBolt·4 videos
10
19,703
Like     Dislike 9

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like TheInsaneBolt's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike TheInsaneBolt's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add TheInsaneBolt's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Aug 29, 2009

A compilation of demolitions conducted using the French demolition technique of vérinage. This is achieved with hydraulics that push structural members out of alignment, allowing the top portion of a building to then demolish the structure below via gravity alone, without the use of explosives. Note that the collapses are rapid and produce copious dust.

  • Category

  • License

    Standard YouTube License

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • gobo760

    ...The things I've shared with you are things that students who are majoring in AE usually grasp in the first few minutes of class, and you don't seem like an unintelligent person, so I'm guessing that you're simply one of these people who loves his conspiracy theories. As such, I know you'll never accept what I'm telling you because you have your own perception of how physics *should* work, regardless of whether or not that actually *is* how it works. So... I can only wish you the best.

    · 4

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate gobo760's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate gobo760's comment.
    in reply to gobo760 (Show the comment)
  • gobo760

    @Funkadelic2, I think it's nice that you have an inquisitive mind, but I've never met anyone with degrees in architectural engineering who have questioned the official findings. Yes I know that there are websites with "engineers" claiming conspiracy, but in both academia and in the private sector, I've yet to meet a single person who shares those views. In fact, most of my colleagues have found it disturbing how so many of those 'engineers' seem to lack a basic understanding about their trade..

    · 3

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate gobo760's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate gobo760's comment.
    in reply to Funkadelic2 (Show the comment)

All Comments (948)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • fukenbiker

    Now that we have examples of conventional studded wall buildings falling down without explosives, we now have a new question!

    Can structures built like those demolished in the above videos withstand the initial impact of an airplane? Perhaps if all the sheer panels were not removed from the studs?

    And why are we comparing apples to oranges anyway? I am certain anyone who believes the lies instead of their eyes, has not seen "Tuesday Morning in September".

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate fukenbiker's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate fukenbiker's comment.
  • fukenbiker

    I'd like to say how reassured I am with the official explanation and the NIST report, but unfortunately the simple construction of studded walls displayed in the video examples above isn't how the world trade center buildings were constructed. If that were the case, the twin towers would not have withstood the initial impact of the planes.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate fukenbiker's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate fukenbiker's comment.
  • Mike Suopys

    The world trade centers collapsed in the same manor.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Mike Suopys's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Mike Suopys's comment.
  • Merlin5x5

    Complete bullshit. Every collapse is symetrical, Dumbshit.

    As long as the parts fall STRAIGHT DOWN, they are going to be.

    It's the collision with the ground that's symetrical.

    Please, don't procreate, you will lower the IQ bar, and we will have to feed your kids in a zoo monkeyland anyway.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Merlin5x5's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Merlin5x5's comment.
    in reply to Funkadelic2 (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later