9/11: DAN RATHER SAYS WTC COLLAPSES LOOK LIKE DEMOLITIONS

Take a close look at the manner in which WTC 7 collapses straight down. For the building to collapse in this fashion, all of the load bearing supports would have had to fail at exactly the same time.
The claim that the collapse was the result of a fire requires the fire be equally distributed throughout the entire floor of the building, providing equal heat for an equal amount of time, so that all the load bearings members would fail at the exact same moment.

Do you find this plausible?

"Amazing, incredible, pick your word. For the third time today, it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down."
CBS News anchor Dan Rather commenting on the collapse of Building 7 - September 11, 2001 at approx 5:30pm EST.




When buildings such as WTC 7 are demolished the collapse is initiated by an explosion in the central area of the basement. This causes the building to collapse in on itself and minimizes damage to surrounding structures [full details].
The video enlargement on the right shows part of WTC 7's roof crumbling seconds before the collapse. The only logical reason for this occurrence is the building was rocked by a powerful explosion. Compare the collapse of WTC 7 to a controlled demolition. The characteristics and speed of the collapses are all but identical. It is impossible for diesel fires to collapse a building in this manner.

• Category

  News & Politics

[ROORWANT]

only 100,000 views. sad.

[RyleKule]

As if the bottom was pulled out from underneath it... absolutely no resistance on the way down; uniform collapse. Fuck you 9/11 comission.

[Ronald Hanlon]

Still a piece of shit

[Ronald Hanlon]

Dan rather has funded the Apollo project

[Ben Sona]

REALITY CHECK FOR THE CONSPIRACY NUTS.

As a structural engineer myself-I can tell you that tower 7 (or any tower) was NOT imploded that day. It would be physically impossible for firefighters or even demolition experts to bring down a building of this size, in this short of time with all the havoc and fire raging around it. PURE SCIENCE FICTION! A small tower requires weeks of prep so the charges can be placed at the right location.

GET OVER IT-DIDN'T HAPPEN!!!!!!!!!!!

[TheDjuss240]

Actually sir, there is a great body of evidence. Maybe you're listening to msm as a trusted resource. The one fact that made me no longer able to believe it wasn't a terrorist attack was the presence of thermite residue on every perfectly slash cut column in those buildings.

[Tressco]

globalresearch. ca/president-of-italys-supreme­-court-to-refer-911-crimes-to-­international-criminal-court

"He stated publicly in writing that 9/11 was just like the “strategy of tension” carried out in Italy.

The fmr. Ital. PM, judge, & former head of Ital. counterintell. admit that NATO, w/ the help of the Pentagon & CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy & oth. Europ. countries in the ‘50s & blamed the communists, in order to rally ppl.’s supp. for their gov’ts in their fight ag. communism.”

[Brent Barrand]

The buildings fell too quickly to have been caused by fires of any kind. These buildings were not made out of twigs. Anyone who believes differently obviously does not understand anything about structural resistance. It is so completely obvious that only those who have not considered the evidence (or complete morons) believe the official story.

watch?v=5QMSAsOkumI

[Brent Barrand]

The evidence is so much more concrete than this though. It is literally impossible for the buildings to have fallen the way we are told that they did. The laws of physics do not permit it, and so far those laws have never been broken before. Why would three falling buildings be the first known exceptions to this?

[Brent Barrand]

Those buildings obviously could not have fallen the way we are told that they did. People much smarter than me have collaboratively confirmed this without a shadow of doubt. The official investigators that admitted that they did not test for explosives are either terrible at understanding the laws of physics, or they flat out lied to us. Either way we deserve an explanation. This will NEVER go way until we have answers, and as time goes on people will become more accepting of the questions.

[OmAr LiVeS]

WHY 18 DISLIKES? AND HOW THE FUCK DO YOU MAKE A MISQUOTE LIKE FUCKING THAT!!?