9/11: DAN RATHER SAYS WTC COLLAPSES LOOK LIKE DEMOLITIONS

Take a close look at the manner in which WTC 7 collapses straight down. For the building to collapse in this fashion, all of the load bearing supports would have had to fail at exactly the same time.
The claim that the collapse was the result of a fire requires the fire be equally distributed throughout the entire floor of the building, providing equal heat for an equal amount of time, so that all the load bearings members would fail at the exact same moment.

Do you find this plausible?

"Amazing, incredible, pick your word. For the third time today, it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down."
CBS News anchor Dan Rather commenting on the collapse of Building 7 - September 11, 2001 at approx 5:30pm EST.




When buildings such as WTC 7 are demolished the collapse is initiated by an explosion in the central area of the basement. This causes the building to collapse in on itself and minimizes damage to surrounding structures [full details].
The video enlargement on the right shows part of WTC 7's roof crumbling seconds before the collapse. The only logical reason for this occurrence is the building was rocked by a powerful explosion. Compare the collapse of WTC 7 to a controlled demolition. The characteristics and speed of the collapses are all but identical. It is impossible for diesel fires to collapse a building in this manner.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• news
• politics
• conspiracy
• 911
• controlled
• demolition
• bush
• building
• seven
• physics

[ROORWANT]

only 100,000 views. sad.

[AntiNWOMusic]

@nardpuncher

That would have been too obvious. Demolition explosives are more subtle and they can construct an alternative theory to feed the people via the propaganda machine while they ship off all the evidence without proper crime scene investigations being carried out.

They don't care about killing and lying, they do care about being caught.

I don't see why it is so difficult to understand that they lie to you, they lied about healthcare, they lied about WMD, lying is their profession.

[mosthighoracle]

It was definently a controlled demolition, WTC 7 Is the only steel framed building in history that is suposed to have collapsed due to fire alone the twin towers were also a controlled demolition. They were built to withstand planes flying into them.

[tomperanteau]

It fell straight down. It was controlled.

[Grvthang]

This is not true. From this angle it looks like it fell straight down, but it didn't - part of it came down across the street onto Fitterman Hall, part of Borough of Manhattan Community College. But explain this to me: the government conspirators who did this decided that demolishing two110-story buildings wouldn't be enough to incite the public, so they threw this building in, too?!?

[Crede06]

I do see the east portion of the building collapsing first, then 8-10 seconds later the whole building collapsing. I can't explain if that means it was a controlled demolition or a building brought down by fires weakening the structure. Almost all the WTC 7 controlled demolition videos on Youtube always omit the east portion collapse and only show the 6.5 second free fall of the whole building. I just want to know the reason why these videos never show the east portion collapse

[harryc25]

WTC7 collapsed perfectly like a controlled demolition. From 2 smouldering fires high up on some floor maybe the 30th something CAN NOT explain how the building came down vertically in on itselff. As seen in so many clips the basement and bottom gave way and looks like the top just falls in and sinks onto its footprint Those who say it was caused by fire and debris or what ever are fools and conspiracy twoofers or what ever names they are throwing around these days to discredit logic!