On March 13 2010 notepad publishing has visited Professor Roessler in his hometown, in Tübingen, Germany, to interview him about the Dangers at the CERN LHC. Visit www.notepad.ch for more information or www.notepad.TV
@Standard999999 It doesn't matter what type of particle is being used. All particles, in such an energetic impact, are rendered into their constituent subatomic particles, like quarks, bosons, etc. Whether you're using hydrogen or uranium, the only relevant factor is the energy of impact.
I guess I AM comparing apples to oranges, but if either one were used in the LHC, they would both be smashed into a subatomic mess - and it would be a valid comparison =)
Err I got that wrong. The LHC at maximum energy output generates 10^14 electron volts. But every day our atmosphere is bombarded with cosmic rays with energies up to 10^20 electron volts.
Do a wikipedia search for "ultra high energy cosmic rays", there's a page dedicated to them.
I think this is mother nature telling us quite conclusively that the LHC is 100% harmless.
Especially if the heavy ions of the lead packets, or millions of protons, converted into pure energy which transmuted to more than twice the speed of light somehow thereby effectively reversing the electromagnetic field already within the particles into a kind of negative vacuum pressure state with a hole in the middle of these stable particles with a butterfly shaped negative EM/ gravity field that would reverse rotation past the light speed barrier thereby counter-rotating having a jet stream
Couldn't the lead protons of the nucleus's form a stable strangelet or mini black hole if there were 2 positive top quarks that fused with 2 negative bottom quarks with a charm or vortex in the middle from a reversed negative Boson-Higgs Field of immense EM/ gravitational energy sucking the Earth into it through the dipole or bipole configuration forming a stable jet stream of particles of antimatter out of it from our own matter?
Was ist mit den Erdspalten und Erdlöchern, die sich plötzlich überall auftun, den massiven Erdrutschen, den nicht enden wollenden Erdbeben? Laut dieser Prognose ist das einfach der Anfang vom Ende: w w w.cerntruth.c o m/?p=50
Professor Rössler hat mich sehr beeindruckt durch seine bescheidene Art und durch sein ständiges Bemühen um mehr Sicherheit. Dabei ist es mir unwichtig, welche Theorie schlussendlich bestätigt wird. Ich bin sehr froh, dass bis jetzt noch nichts Schlimmes passiert ist beim LHC.
@Standard999999 It doesn't matter what type of particle is being used. All particles, in such an energetic impact, are rendered into their constituent subatomic particles, like quarks, bosons, etc. Whether you're using hydrogen or uranium, the only relevant factor is the energy of impact.
I guess I AM comparing apples to oranges, but if either one were used in the LHC, they would both be smashed into a subatomic mess - and it would be a valid comparison =)
zapproowsdower 1 year ago
Err I got that wrong. The LHC at maximum energy output generates 10^14 electron volts. But every day our atmosphere is bombarded with cosmic rays with energies up to 10^20 electron volts.
Do a wikipedia search for "ultra high energy cosmic rays", there's a page dedicated to them.
I think this is mother nature telling us quite conclusively that the LHC is 100% harmless.
zapproowsdower 1 year ago
locked within two concentric stable orbits of opposing fields opposite of each other consuming all matter that surrounds them?
toga2050 1 year ago
between the two oppositely opposed concentric dipole rings created of opposite charge
toga2050 1 year ago
Especially if the heavy ions of the lead packets, or millions of protons, converted into pure energy which transmuted to more than twice the speed of light somehow thereby effectively reversing the electromagnetic field already within the particles into a kind of negative vacuum pressure state with a hole in the middle of these stable particles with a butterfly shaped negative EM/ gravity field that would reverse rotation past the light speed barrier thereby counter-rotating having a jet stream
toga2050 1 year ago
Couldn't the lead protons of the nucleus's form a stable strangelet or mini black hole if there were 2 positive top quarks that fused with 2 negative bottom quarks with a charm or vortex in the middle from a reversed negative Boson-Higgs Field of immense EM/ gravitational energy sucking the Earth into it through the dipole or bipole configuration forming a stable jet stream of particles of antimatter out of it from our own matter?
toga2050 1 year ago
@Prruuhh
Was ist mit den Erdspalten und Erdlöchern, die sich plötzlich überall auftun, den massiven Erdrutschen, den nicht enden wollenden Erdbeben? Laut dieser Prognose ist das einfach der Anfang vom Ende: w w w.cerntruth.c o m/?p=50
icke11234 1 year ago
Professor Rössler hat mich sehr beeindruckt durch seine bescheidene Art und durch sein ständiges Bemühen um mehr Sicherheit. Dabei ist es mir unwichtig, welche Theorie schlussendlich bestätigt wird. Ich bin sehr froh, dass bis jetzt noch nichts Schlimmes passiert ist beim LHC.
Prruuhh 1 year ago
Go to Part 4 at around 32 seconds of this interview to understand what the Professor is talking about.
Peace
truefictions 1 year ago
i think this man is brillient and this man is qualified to know this ,,,,thankyou for being brave
oliviamulgrew 1 year ago