Non-Aggression
Loading...
67
views
Loading...
Uploader Comments (MrShittyFag)
Top Comments
-
No one commits an immoral act by producing a superior product. No unfair loss is experienced by those who offer an inferior one.
-
You should have my response tomorrow evening or the next day.
see all
Video Responses
This video is a response to The Non-Aggression Principle is a Fantasy 2011-06-24
see all
All Comments (19)
-
I don't think it's the "state" who operates the violence. A lot of animals form hierarchies. The only thing worse than hierarchies are what the people at the top will do to maintain them. I believe if there were no government that we'd still be taking grief from someone or a group of organized people wanting to be top dog.
I do agree with you that people are more inclined to listen when a gun is not pointed at their head
-
Economic aggression? This is your idea of original thinking. Seriously
Loading...
How are there more losers in the free market system, then there are in statist systems?
You dont know what agression is and what it means to harm someone. If someone is making a deal, only those two get better and no one gets worse off. Why? Because other businesses and people still have their products and private properties.
I also dont see how economic agression is worse then physical agression.
MeneerVerspiller 1 month ago
@MeneerVerspiller I think you missed my point. All I'm saying is that when 2 people agree to make a deal,THEY are not harmed, but the other sellers, who weren't involved in the deal, could suffer because their own products were passed up in favor of the chosen seller's. That is the nature of competition, why else do corporations&governments today avoid competition at all cost? These institutions know that if a private sector market were established in their field,they'd be fukd
MrShittyFag 1 month ago
@MrShittyFag Your products not being bought is not agression. As I said, you still have your products and properties. And there might be lots of people willing to do business with you. It also assumes that if the first deal didnt happen your product would be bought instead.
Yes, corporations avoid competition because they provide shitty quality and they know it. So they use PHYSICAL agression to steal our money to force their shitty products upon the population.
MeneerVerspiller 1 month ago
@MeneerVerspiller "Your products not being bought is not agression"
sure it is. when you buy any product, you support the people making it and harm the people who you don't buy from. Each company is fighting for a market share. Just being in the market inherently means you're determining other people's fates.
My friend did this video, he makes a good point in there
/watch?v=gUMm0OeQiC0
MrShittyFag 1 month ago
You start your video off by telling us that Non-Aggression (as in the principle of non-aggression) is bullshit, and then you go on to decry some other forms of "aggression". Rightio.
Victorprossart1 7 months ago
@Victorprossart1 I don't reject any form of aggression. The video is pretty much just a summery
MrShittyFag 7 months ago