Has history been tampered with? First,Second,Third&Fourth Crusades=First World War of Troy
Uploader Comments (mithec)
All Comments (33)
-
How are they going to explain things like...radio carbon dating when something shows up 1000 years old? dendricology? (tree rings), what about the ice cores in Antartica that provide proof of events that volcanoes erupted in the 5th century? For history books elsewhere, like the sagas of Norse legend? the Krishna, and Hindi records? Don't tell me the thousands of people (including the equipment used) were all wrong.
The only thing fabricated here is the idea. which amounts to a fairytale.
-
This is one of the most retarded videos I have ever seen.
The record is off by 1900 years? Really???
-
@mithec yes old Testament was compiled in 11. century - AFTER the "new" one totally agree...
there was also in fact no "X" or IX ... (X = XPCT - Kristus - Christ) century AD at all...
all Yahwistic Jesuit OCCULT hoax
-
@mithec indeed...Chinese alphabet was derived from old "Hyperborean" (Daarian Slavic runes ) - the first northern Chinese rulers were white (Caucasian) - read about Chinese white mummies... also about Mesoamerican white mummies...
there was once a great empire, called Tartaria (still 5000 BC)
Later Chinese rulers compiled new alphabet (3 different types based on Daarian runes) and hide all traces of previous civilization or Aryan culture.
-
present some of this "proof", and the papers where historians document this.
-
If the Egyptians were mad up in the renaissance, then how did those big pyramids appear, or let me guess, the Italians sneaked them over the border. Our Saviour Jesus Christ was not crucified in 1053, that is blasphemy, there are plenty of records stating that there were popes well before that time, and you can have popes without Catholicism. You are just saying that this is true, because you don't have a 1000 year old witness to say that it isn't.
-
This guy should channel his energies into something else, history clearly isnt his thing, lmao.
-
What if a mad russian mathematican writes books with over 600 pages filled with complete nonsense, and then makes the most hilarious video's trying to sell these to American consumers?
Thank you for making these vid's, they are sooo funny,
-
long live the kuffaar.
-.-
Ancient China is a myth. The compilation of the so-called Ancient Chinese History is reliably datable to the XVII-XVIII century only. It is perfectly recognizable as the Ancient European history, reworked and transcribed in hieroglyphs as yet another historical transplantation, this time performed on the Chinese soil by the loving Jesuit hands.
mithec 4 years ago
right.Terrific Ghengis et al.`Mongol` nomadic tribes were small, illiterate and scattered before 19th cy, in fact they even did not even know they were touted in Russia and Europe as great conquerors. Russian history as we know it today is a blatant forgery concocted by a host of German scientists brought to Russia by the usurper dynasty of the Romanovs, whose ascension to the throne was the result of conspiracy, charged with the mission of making their reign look legitimate.
mithec 4 years ago
Occam razor cuts: Sapiens sapiens species <=150000 years old, civilization (state+army+ideology+writing) goes only as far back as AD 800, very scarce information from 8-10 cy AD events, most historical events took place in 10-15th cy AD. Jesus 1153-1186 AD. Old Testament compiled in 12-16 cy AD, AFTER New One, it renders events of that period. All methods of dating of artefacts, including c14 are non-exact and contradictory, there are no written ORIGINALS datable earlier than the XI century.
mithec 4 years ago
go to google>to `more`> to `book search`>type keyword `fomenko`, read TOC or the whole book for this matter and free of charge.
mithec 5 years ago
The history of humankind to be both dramatically different and drastically shorter than generally presumed. Archaeological, dendrochronological, paleographical and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artifacts are both non-exact and contradictory, therefore there is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artifact that could be reliably and independently dated earlier than the XI century.
mithec 5 years ago