Thomas Hearns vs. Roberto Duran

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,571
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 31, 2010

Thomas "Hitman" Hearns vs. Roberto Duran - 6/15/1984

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Omg excuses excuses the Mans was 32 Durans wasnt 40 or 38 he was 32. He chose and accepted the fight with hearns and got knocked the fuck out. you guys can come up all the excuses to defend him and justify his lose but plain and simple Duran got knocked the fuck out against the hitman.

  • why the fuck was duran smiling the whole time u getting your ass whooped

see all

All Comments (39)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • duran looks like a caveman

  • that was a sickening right hook i cant even see properly hearns is that fast

  • @Maafa1619 Why don't you give SRL credit? He did what he did you can't re-write history or take away fights in the books so why even bother arguing against the facts? I don't like Mayweather I'm not going to post he is less a fighter than he has proven himself to be. I do route against him but I wouldn't besmirch what he's done. I would not call people a fool or a liar for posting on you tube something I disagree with. Unless they posted an out & out lie

  • @Maafa1619 Hearns was gassed he had nothing left and SRL is a great finisher the Ref did the right thing. You must be from the era of Roids so everyone you saw might have been on them. So going by that Hearns was too how did he get so big? Or maybe they were both just getting old and gaining weight is a part of that. I know they did testing for certain drugs back then after every fight just like now. My point is don't accuse people of things you have no proof of. Shouldn't call people fools too

  • @tellthetruthg Hearns wasn't given the opportunity to work his way out of trouble in the first fight. He was hardly, "out on his feet." In the second fight, he soundly beat Ray Leonard. He dominated him and knocked him down at twice, if memory serves. Moreover, if you've ever seen the second fight and you're suggesting that Ray Leonard wasn't taking steroids or something similar, then you are either a liar or a fool. He looked preposterous.

  • @Maafa1619 we disagree I won't get into the officiating of either fight because who knows. I do know in the 1rst fight Hearns was out on his feet, what more did you need to see Hearns face down getting counted out? Guessing SRL was on roids is just plain sore loser syndrome. Anyway I never saw a steroid punch anyone in the mouth

  • Hearns is a fucking beast! He was a welterweight that could knock out a welterweight!

  • Holyshit, two of my fav boxers going at it in a great boxing match. This was way before my time(born in 1988) but damn, I wish I could have seen this live.

  • @TheEaglesfanindc Fighters are hurt, they often start grinning. 

  • @tellthetruthg Bullshit. In both Hearns v Leonard fights, the officials skewed the fight in Leonard's favor. In the first fight, the ref prematurely stopped the fight with Hearns ahead in the scoring. In the second fight, Hearns be Leonard--despite his obvious use of steroids--like a rented mule, and they still called it a draw.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more