Morality. Fantasy? Objective? Subjective?
Uploader Comments (MotionFur)
All Comments (31)
-
Very solid video. Categorizing thoughts to create a sound foundation to think from lol :]
Good stuff
-
Suppose what i mean by true and false is that it's true that by our common definition of a glass, an empty glass can be filled with water. As long as glasses exist. Which is always true only as long as the glass is a glass. so emperically we have to verify it. but that's how glasses work. So it's true that this kind of glass can be filled and false that it cannot.
It seems we can conclude that somethings always true, yet we still live in an emperical world, in which we trust our senses.
-
... Sorry, the former are morals, the latter are "hand-me-downs" and traditions like "Kantianisms".
"That's Kantian." "That's Nietzschean." "That's a Samuel Johnsonism." etc.
-
My idea wasn't Kantian. It was mine, and when Kant had it, it was his.
The difference between morals and "hand-me-downs" and traditions like Kantianisms, is the former are made by individuals for themselves, but the latter are not.
A passively-held belief in something idea as right, while not knowing why, is not a moral.
Being a furry is immoral
MachineLegion 2 years ago
That's just cold.
MotionFur 2 years ago
YIFF IN HELL!
MachineLegion 2 years ago
Will you be there?
MotionFur 2 years ago
prolly
MachineLegion 2 years ago
Alrighty, well i'ma go afk for a while then try and get in stickam.
Yiff ya later ;)
MotionFur 2 years ago