2007 Wimbledon - Final: Federer vs Nadal [HD] (part 2/2)
Loading...
11,057
Loading...
Top Comments
see all
All Comments (9)
-
Stupid Djoko below fan who does not understand how it is such a legend for Federer to have won 16 grand slams. Compared to that, Djoko is an infant.
-
So 2007 Federer who could barely take out a 20-21 year old Nadal who still at that time did not figure out his grass court game is better then 2011 Djokovic who destroyed a 25 year old #1 Nadal who had won the last 2 Wimbledons that he competed in. Give me 2011 Djokovic
-
@Witchkae wtf has djokovic to do with a federer vs nadal in 2007 final? We already know federer is the g.o.a.t.
-
The quality is just amazing
-
lol is fed for real with that collapse to the ground? looks like he hit his head.
-
great video
Loading...
Fed when he was invincible. Even 2011 Djokovic or 2010 Nadal would be blown away by 2006-7 Federer.
Witchkae 8 months ago 13
@sumadinac09 Let's see: Fed vs Djokovic grand slam matches
Federer won against him - AO 2007, USO 2007, USO 2008, USO 2009, RG 2011
Djokovic won against roger - AO 2008(mono for fed), USO 2010(BARELY), AO 2011(Nole deserved to win), USO 2011(BARELY)
Federer leads 5-4
So Nole is getting an ill roger at 26 age or a 29/30 year old federer, that too barely .
Nole can't dominate roger even at an age of 30 even when on hard court (nole's favourite).
So whose better?
michaeljackson5able 5 months ago 6