Why Creationists are WRONG about MacroEvolution

how#1 : by random mutations in duplicated genes, for example

how#2 : you can't, because buildings don't reproduce

Olde discredited arguments indeed.

@ThinkingB - ' I often wonder what he Pope himself is thinking ever day...'
He knows he is the New Testament Patriarch of GOD's people given to him by the Lord Himself, the lineage of the Old Testament patriarchs since Adam, the VISIBLE VOICE on Earth.
Protestants would tell you they would follow the OldTestament Patriarchs but they fail to realize there STILL MUST BE a visible VOICE since The Church is visible.
The Pope will define what is true and what is FALSE for the theory of evolution.

The pope is just a normal human being with a job assigned to him within a particular religion. There is nothing supernatural about him.
Thanks to the theory of evolution, the human mind has evolved into seeking understanding of our own existence and the many man-made religions are just byproducts of evolution. So is the pope himself. Today we are rapidly replacing ancient myth based explanations with real knowledge however. You might not like it, but truths are replacing myths.

How nice that an individual like you can be declared a genius of this world when you will get the same reward as the imbeciles. Nothing. Remember to blame your phony version of the ' theory of evolution' and NOT GOD for your very end.
The Pope would tell you himself that he is just a normal human BEING with NO supernatural powers. Yet, he is in the order of Generation from Adam and Eve the leader of GOD's VISIBLE people.
The parts 'evolved' of evolution can be explained by the Whole.

@Aresthanas, I get plenty of rewards in what I'm doing now.
It's sad how some percentage of religious people are still desparately trying to prove evolution wrong. Factually it has just been growing stronger since Darwin made his claim - now with not only tons of fossil findings proving it but also a mindblowing list of DNA markers that only makes sense in the light of evolution. There are just so many reasons why there is concensus among real experts in biology. Try study it for real!

ThinkingBetter,
' It's sad how some percentage of religious people are still desparately trying to prove evolution wrong.'
That is a complete fallacy about 'religious people' as actual legimate scientists are against the Darwinian phony version ; about how or what is 'evolution'.
It depends what CHANGE occurred. NOTHING of the Darwinian version. Let me know when you got a single PROOF for it. The 'evolution' chart can be explained in a very NATURAL way based on the Whole.

Aresthanas, what I have seen promoting creationism is just a very tiny minority of scientists, usually not actually educated in the field of evolution, speaking with some sort of religious agenda; perhaps making money out of books etc.

It sounds like you don' really know much about evolution. There is no controversy among actual experts in this field. I have yet to see a creationist claim among the many science reports in professional research databases like Pubmed or Plosbiology.

Life is the reward, fool.
But it's not enough for you, you need BDSM to spice it up I suppose.

The pope lacks the credentials to define anything about evolution as true or false or to pass any judgement on it.
This is nature's judgement, some can be cult leaders, some can be scientists.

@hjhenifer - ' The pope lacks the credentials to define anything about evolution as true or false...'
Doesn' t matter appealing to authority as you'll resort to some negative comment on authority but you appeal to scientific peer reviews? Yes, that is at the Pope's exposal. As the VISIBLE voice, so you have Proof to SEE and HEAR, it'll be in the affirmative and the negative. There's plenty of Catholic and non-Catholic scientists against the Darwinian PHONY version 'on the theory of evolution'.