Constitutional Principles: Separation of Powers
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like BillofRightsInst's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike BillofRightsInst's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add BillofRightsInst's video to your playlist.
Published on Aug 24, 2012
Do you understand why separation of powers is important for protecting our freedom? This short, engaging video focuses on the constitutional principle of separation of powers. Clear definitions and graphics, an engaging historical narrative, brief scholar interviews, and memorable quotes will make this 6-minute video perfect for use any time of the year! A short viewing guide is also available at www.BillofRightsInstitute.org.
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
The interactive transcript could not be loaded.
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
-
3:13
States and Capitals Song by Musical Stewby MusicalStewdioFeatured
202,836
-
7:54
Constitutional Principles: The Rule of Lawby BillofRightsInst
19,210 views
-
5:35
Constitutional Principles: Consent of the Governedby BillofRightsInst
8,619 views
-
5:12
Constitutional Principles: Representative Governmentby BillofRightsInst
15,700 views
-
44:21
Clarence Thomas at Being an American Essay Contestby BillofRightsInst
1,258 views
-
Separation of powers
3,086 videos6
-
20:02
Checks and Balances for Dummiesby Keith Hughes
12,982 views
-
3:31
BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENTby songsofhigherlrng
4,461 views
-
10:01
LAW121 - New Zealand's System of Governmentby mohsenalattar1
2,930 views
-
2:22
What is the Rule of Law?by usinstituteofpeace
2,940 views
-
0:51
Lord Phillips - The 'Separation of Powers'by ConSocYT
610 views
-
8:47
The Bill of Rights - Part 2 - The Amendmentsby Sean Malone
6,419 views
-
29:45
Introduction to the Constitution - Part 3by hillsdalecollege
89,050 views
-
10:53
David Theroux on Life in a Libertarian Societyby independentinstitute
1,272 views
-
1:00:00
Constitutional Law Class -- Prof. David B. Cruzby USCGould
30,815 views
-
15:01
The Constitutional Convention for Dummiesby Keith Hughes
31,376 views
-
44:13
4. The Division of Powers- Montesquieuby YaleCourses
7,870 views
-
9:55
America (I) The Secular Constitutionby pangeaprogressblog
2,904 views
-
9:30
Bill of Rights Pt. 1 (Principles of the Constitution Series)by FreedomProjectDotCom
38,980 views
-
11:38
Checks and Balances: The Three Branches of State Governmentby LegiSchool
6,139 views
-
7:05
Politics and The Policy Processby SEASLLorg
5,815 views
- Loading more suggestions...
All Comments (4)
Wave Strike 8 months ago
You will get more respect of you spell entitled correctly. If you can't spell, leave the hard work to us intelligent people.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
brandoncheatem 8 months ago
Obama was a Constitutional Law professor. I am sure he is.
Also, to make disperaging remarks without data points or supporting facts, (i.e. the actual Bill number, article number or executive order number signed), is in itself dishonest. Thusly, you will not get the respect that you feel you may be intitled to. You will get the respect of a dishonest person. You should identify these facts before you make the statement.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Wave Strike 8 months ago
Obama should watch this. He is unaware of a separation of powers. He thinks the executive makes law. One example of this is his waiver of the welfare work requirements.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
JohnJ2427 8 months ago
No! The judiciary's role is to apply the law, not interpret it. To say that their job is to interpret the law is to give them the power to rewrite it. If their job is to interpret the law, who is anyone else to say that they misinterpreted it? The judiciary is supposed to apply the law.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube