Kenneth Miller evolution and faith 2of9

Kenneth Miller discusses evolution, faith, Intelligent Design and Dover. http://www.hhmi.org
http://www.biointeractive.org

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Kenneth
• Miller
• Intelligent
• design
• evolution
• creation
• dover

[LoricaLady]

ANYONE: If you see no response to some posters below, they know they are on ignore for things like name calling, personal insults, gross obscenities, sometimes false accusations of lying and sometimes worse. Some of them follow me & others around YT with such tactics. If anyone wants to make their same "points" in their own words, I will be happy to respond. However I limit my time to where true debate is possible, with those who are civil & objective.

[LoricaLady]

Cont. Correlation Does Not Imply Causation logical fallacy. Chimps & tobacco have 48 chromosomes, birds, bats & moths fly, worms & snakes slither on the ground. So? Correlation Does Not Imply Causation. 3) The Incomplete Comparison Fallacy. Yes, there is a superficial match when counting the chromosomes but what is inside the chromosomes is no way the same. And anyway who says we evolved from chimps? No one.  So no matter how you look at it, the argument is bogus. As usual with evolution.

[ThatOneQuestion]

"Again, this ain't science. This is pseudo science."

And what the hell would you know about "science", LoricaLady??

You, like so many other ID fanboys, sit on your ass and pretend you have a damn clue, spouting off your ridiculous opinions as if we cant see through your lies.

Just how many times are we going to have to correct idiots like you on these subjects??

[ThatOneQuestion]

"real science deals with what is observable, repeatable, testable"

Review the transcript for the Dover Trail, you ignorant fool.

Your assertions are complete bullshit.

[ThatOneQuestion]

"The students are just supposed to, and do, assume his statments are unquestioned, unquestionable facts."

You filthy liar. Show me where Miller says everyone MUST take everything he says as the unquestioned truth about the world.

You are such a god damned failure at this debate.

[LoricaLady]

Ansondiak - It is also interesting that Miller never corrected the t.v. show host about the primal pond. He never said the truth, i.e. there is zero evidence for any such primal pond or that life can come from inorganic material.  This gives the impression that he agrees with the host. He lets the lie hang out there for the public to swallow. Again, this ain't science. This is pseudo science.

[LoricaLady]

Cont. "looks like" "might" & "suggested." Yes, there is a clear relationship between the giant sloth and the smaller sloth. They are both sloths, so big deal. But that extinct animal & the armadillo in the same clip? How do we know that extinct animal ever had any descendants in any way different from itself and isn't just simply extinct? We do not. This is faith presented as science.