Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Apollo Command Module

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
12,036
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 30, 2007

Category:

Travel & Events

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • you dont need to be a retard to be an apollogist but it helps.get real

  • You have a NASA shirt, "Sir, sir, can you please tell me why my daughters asks retarded questions ?

  • The only thing that's crushing is the tightness of your tinfoil hat.

  • sounds exciting.

  • Haha, back in 1972, the Shuttle was state-of-the-art technology!

    Now, NASA plans to revive the Apollo design. Back to '68 we go!

  • Actually the answer to that simple question is very complex.

    A winged vehicle could be used for lunar flight but it would require a heavier TPS and would likely require a skip reentry.

    The engineering on getting a capsule or lifting body to handle lunar reentries is a lot easier and it's more mass efficient.

    Though the Apollo shape isn't the best shape for the task the biconic and HL20 shapes have better lift to drag while the discoverer and headlamp/soyuz shapes are more mass efficient .

  • fly a plane to the moon. Why dont wings work LOL!!!!!!1

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more