Intelligent Design Theory

Intelligent Design Theory. Another video clip from our friends at http://www.IllustraMedia.com - Unlocking the Mystery of Life.

Intelligent Design is obvious upon close examination of any machine. The concept and design inherent in a machine, whether simple or complex, is self-evident. Whether a machine is high quality or low quality, its designer is both necessary and apparent. Information Theory states that concept and design can only result from a mind. Even the diminished quality of a poorly constructed machine cannot obscure the necessity of an intelligent designer. Machines, as defined by French Biochemist and Nobel Laureate Jacques Lucien Monod (1910-1976), are "purposeful aggregates of matter that, utilizing energy, perform specific tasks." By this authoritative definition, living systems are recognized as machines. A living organism fulfills the definition of a machine all the way down to the molecular level. And yet, because of the philosophical and religious implications of life resulting from Intelligent Design, a surprisingly large portion of the intelligentsia seek to find a mechanism by which life may arise naturally by random chance. Evolutionists admit the inconsistency. George Wald, an evolutionist, states, "When it comes to the origin of life there are only two possibilities: creation or spontaneous generation. There is no third way. Spontaneous generation was disproved one hundred years ago, but that leads us to only one other conclusion, that of supernatural creation. We cannot accept that on philosophical grounds; therefore, we choose to believe the impossible: that life arose spontaneously by chance!" ("The Origin of Life," Scientific American, 191:48. May 1954).

Intelligent Design in Life
Ignoring the obvious Intelligent Design that permeates life, scientists have developed the theory of evolution in an effort to explain the origin of life via spontaneous generation. This "scientific" theory is very distinctive. Commonly, scientists observe data, interpret the data, and then formulate conclusions based upon that data. Yet, evolutionists have formulated their "scientific" conclusion without resorting to any data at all. In fact, evolutionists have steadfastly maintained their conclusion despite data to the contrary.

Please visit http://www.allaboutscience.org/intelligent-design.htm for more on Intelligent Design Theory.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Intelligent Design
• Theory
• Life
• Illustra Media
• Mystery of Life
• Machines
• Irreducible Complexity
• DNA
• Randall Niles
• You Tube
• Video
• yt:stretch=16:9

[IcemanSupaFly]

@MrMegatruth

you seem a little upset steven.

dont you like being exposed as a queer?

[ndzoko]

@logicCplusplus And you sir, are not only arrogant, but ignorant of scriptures:

And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be GENTLE unto all, apt to teach, patient, In MEEKNESS instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth; And [that] they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil,

[logicCplusplus]

@rnalithe00

I have provided you a link to peer-reviewed papers, I guess you will ignore those as well. Thats okay.

For our viewers who aren't as ignorant as you, I will say if you would like to keep up to date on the status of ID, go to uncommondescent (dot) org

[rnalithe00]

@logicCplusplus Ah, Discovery Institute. Is that the blog you follow? No wonder you DIDN'T know about the Dover trial - they were the "expert" (and I use that term very loosely) witnesses who attempted to defend the teaching of ID at that trial. They have conducted no peer reviewed studies to support their case.

Bottom line: ID is useless, as it has no evidence, no explanatory power and no predictive power. Instead of engaging in name-calling, explain why it is important, please.

[logicCplusplus]

@ndzoko

And that says nothing about whether x is or isn't designed or whether nature operating freely is capable of producing x.

These are philosophical issues not ID issues. Theology has answers to the problem of evil in the universe, but ID is not about that.

Thanks for playing.

next...

[IcemanSupaFly]

@MrMegatruth

you are a joke steven

[logicCplusplus]

@rnalithe00

Arrogant typical nonsense from typical "Youtube atheists". The right blogs can lead to the right references (pointers). What kind of sloppy Engineer are you? Thankfully I don't have to work with you.

discovery (dot) org (front-slash)a(front-slash)264­0

[rnalithe00]

@EXALTEDDIRT Christ? I thought we were talking about "intelligent design". logicCplusplus even said intelligent design and the bible are two completely different things. And here you are preaching about "Christ" and "Hell" and "sin". Hmmm....

[rnalithe00]

@logicCplusplus You're right, there is no point in you responding. All your responses have been vague and weak. "Do more research"? That's not a rebuttal.

By the way, scientific understanding of the universe is refined via peer reviewed studies found in scientific journals, not blogs. Porn stars have blogs. Do you get your science from them too?

[ndzoko]

This supposedly intelligent designer left about 2 million asteroids, meteorites in wayward trajectories, threatening our very existence. He left unreliable weather patterns, plate tectonics., about 2 million toxins., about 2 million disease causing agents,. This intelligent designer , creator of all life(supposedly) causes 4,500,000 stillbirths a year. About 5 million deads in the first year of life. He made human childbirth the most painful and accident-prone of all mammals.